SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg Jung who wrote (21487)11/6/1997 10:56:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 61433
 
Managers to force VPN specs By Joe Paone etwork managers fed up with unmet promises of Virtual Private Networking interoperability are taking action to push the process along. The corporate desire to use the Internet for WAN connectivity and extranets is intensifying. However, at NetWorld+Interop in Atlanta earlier this month dozens of vendors hawked VPN products but few demonstrated interoperability under the IETF's (Internet Engineering Task Force's) IPsec (IP security) VPN standard. The lack of progress makes managers the driving force behind standards: those eager to move forward with their VPN plans are either putting the heat on vendors or working their own way around the interoperability problem. In perhaps the most impressive example of the former approach, the Big Three automakers--Chrysler Corp., Ford Motor Co., and General Motors Corp.--threw down the gauntlet in front of vendors and service providers who are eager to sell VPN products and services but who are sluggish on key criteria such as interoperability, security, and service quality. The Big Three's mandate is, simply: Live up to our requirements or you will not play ball in what is generally acknowledged to be the largest publicly known VPN-extranet project to date. "The Big Three automakers are driving these standards to be completed faster than is typical historically," said Kurt Bauer, vice president at Ascend Communications Inc., a networking products vendor in Alameda, Calif. "They want IPsec interoperability." Banding together under the aegis of the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG), the auto industry expects vendors and service providers to meet strict criteria as they form a common Internet-based communications network, the Automotive Network eXchange (ANX). The ANX is intended to provide a common, standards-based, less-expensive infrastructure for trade between the involved companies. It is slated to replace the slew of incompatible links the companies have in place--links that differ in topology and system requirements. Some companies actually have multiple links with each other based on which application they are using. "We're looking to eliminate waste and redundancy in the supply chain," said Karl Schohl, ANX business manager at the AIAG in Southfield, Mich. He explained that beyond a common network, the auto makers are also working to cooperate on other specialized interests, such as CAD/CAM systems and product-quality standards. With the ANX, all of the companies can use the same network, regardless of application, and use any ANX-approved product or service they wish. The network will hopefully result in lower costs of doing business and, ultimately, slightly less expensive cars. The ANX is aggressively testing both equipment and service providers. It has held four equipment-interoperability workshops this year involving more than 25 vendors, and only six vendors have proven fully interoperable under IPsec. So they are starting their pilot program this month, said sources, with only those vendors. "The line in the sand has been drawn with these vendors," said AIAG's Schohl. The AIAG is through with holding interoperability workshops, he added; it's up to the vendors to schedule further interoperability tests. One of the fully interoperable vendors, TimeStep Corp., hosted the last workshop. "Lack of interoperability has not had a huge effect on selling to a single company that wants to connect its offices over the Internet, or do remote access," said Tony Rosati, vice president of business development and marketing at TimeStep in Kanata, Ontario. "But it has affected large-scale deployment. Secure extranets between multiple companies are not possible without interoperability." Rosati and others suggested that many vendors who claim to be "IPsec-compliant" in fact use IPsec encryption, but do not adequately support newer features of the standard such as key management, which is vital for authentication and handshaking purposes. The AIAG is also expecting a lot from service providers, commissioning telecommunications R & D icon Bell Communications Research to certify carriers offering VPN services based on a list of eight criteria: network services, interoperability, performance, reliability, business continuity and disaster recovery, security, customer care, and trouble handling. Bellcore will recertify providers on an ongoing basis and will have the power to place delinquent providers on probation. Other vertical industries such as health care are watching the ANX carefully. Obviously, involvement with the ANX is a feather in the cap that will validate vendors and providers to those industries. "Service providers are falling all over themselves to avoid losing this business," said Jim Hurley, director of operating environments at Aberdeen Group Inc., a research and consulting company in Boston. While ambitious VPNs will require these levels of service, most industry watchers and managers feel the requirements need not be as tight for smaller business and smaller extranets that can be built with more informal cooperation. "It's an issue for vertical industries like the automotive industry," said David Passmore, president of Decisys Inc., a consultancy in Sterling, Va. "But [all of the ANX's criteria] are not essential in all market segments." Passmore sees two emerging VPN models that are less comprehensive than the ANX model: one in which companies buy their own gear and use a generic Internet service, and the other in which companies contract with a common service provider that installs and manages all of the equipment necessary at their points of presence (POPs) or at the company sites. Companies also differ in terms of priorities: security, cost, reliability, performance, or interoperability. Depending on what is most important to a company, and whether they are using VPNs for branch-office connectivity, remote access, or extranets, one approach may be more suitable than the other. It is clear that some companies cannot afford to wait and see how the ANX shakes out. Aberdeen's Hurley recently consulted a company that wanted to set up an extranet with a couple of partners. "This company was not going to wait for Ford, Chrysler, and GM," he said. "They said, 'That's nice, but we need to do whatever we have to do now to make this come to fruition.'" Steve Lopez, director of networking at the National Board of Medical Examiners in Philadelphia, is looking to set up a VPN with two other organizations and he isn't too concerned with the ANX either, nor is he eagerly anticipating specialized VPN service from providers. "We're willing to take performance hits," said Lopez. "I'd rather buy Internet service as a commodity and hook up my own equipment. I don't buy the service-provider argument." Still, vendors and service providers have more work to do to hone VPN products and services in order to appeal to the broadest range of production environments. "Lots of companies are just coming around to frame relay," said Passmore. "We're talking two or three years away here before VPN takes off."