Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill B who wrote (24576)	11/6/1997 10:54:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Hey Bill: Anyone can make a mistake. But Jackson has really done his DD on this one. After all, he has uncovered the missing CL question!

To: Bill B who wrote (24576)	11/6/1997 3:16:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill B; A yes those halcyon days with gold up, and BRE-X below the horizon. We all had our hopes dashed by these two events. However it is impostant to note that Barrick drills are again in operation. And in fact PFG would gain 100% of the deposit if Barrick walked. The lower value was the result of a report on a small portion of Diablillos. As yet under 25% has been explored, and there remains some geophysics and further drilling before Cerro Blanco turns to dust. If I am 100% wrong, then bet against me, buy some more IPM, at these prices it is a steal if I am wrong. Bill