SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (566725)5/17/2010 1:33:39 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1587291
 
Clarence Thomas controversy

Main article: Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination

In 1981, Hill became an attorney-adviser to Clarence Thomas at the U.S. Department of Education (ED). When Thomas became Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Hill went to the EEOC with Thomas and his then-secretary, Diane Holt, to serve as his special assistant. Hill alleges that it was during these two periods (i.e., during her employment at ED and EEOC) that Thomas made sexually provocative statements.

Although Hill was a career employee (Schedule A) and therefore had the option of remaining at the Department of Education, she testified that she followed Thomas because, "[t]he work, itself, was interesting, and at that time, it appeared that the sexual overtures . . . had ended."[2] Also, she testified that she wanted to work in the civil-rights field, and that she believed that "at that time the Department of Education, itself, was a dubious venture."[2]

On October 11, 1991, Hill was called to testify during the Senate confirmation hearing of then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. Hill's allegations against Thomas were made public when information from an FBI interview about the allegations was leaked to the media days before the final Senate vote on his appointment. Thomas was nominated by then-President George H. W. Bush to replace the retiring Justice Thurgood Marshall.

Hill's testimony included a wide variety of language she allegedly was subjected to by Thomas that she found inappropriate:

He spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes....On several occasions, Thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess....Thomas was drinking a Coke in his office, he got up from the table at which we were working, went over to his desk to get the Coke, looked at the can and asked, "Who has put pubic hair on my Coke?"[3]

Four individuals (Ellen Wells, John W. Carr, Judge Susan Hoerchner, and Joel Paul) testified that Hill had been upset at the time she worked for Thomas about what she had said was sexual harassment by him. Angela Wright, another of Thomas' subordinates, stated that she had not considered the behavior to be sexual harassment, but that others might. She was interviewed by Senate Judiciary Committee staff, but did not testify at the hearings. Wright had been fired by Thomas from the EEOC. [4]

Thomas made a blanket denial of the accusations, claiming this was a "high-tech lynching".[5] After extensive debate, the U.S. Senate confirmed Thomas by a vote of 52–48.[6]

en.wikipedia.org



To: i-node who wrote (566725)5/17/2010 1:37:21 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1587291
 
This, of course, is nothing more than a shameless unfounded attack on Thomas. A high-tech lynching, taking place right here on SI.

You mean a high tech lynching like this one:

Ex-judge accused of spanking U.S. male inmates in his office and awarding them reduced jail time in return for sex

"In an echo of sex allegations made against black Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas, Thomas's lawyer called the indictment ‘a high-tech lynching’.

‘They don't like uppity black folks, and that's what they consider Herman,’ Clark added

The 48-year-old insists he is innocent and claims he was trying to mentor the inmates.

Chief Assistant District Attorney Nicki Patterson said authorities began looking at Thomas after he changed a jail sentence in 2006 for his cousin, former Mobile County school commissioner David Thomas, even though the case was being handled by another judge."

Read more: dailymail.co.uk



To: i-node who wrote (566725)5/17/2010 1:44:01 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1587291
 
Liberals hate conservative blacks even more than white conservatives. They know they need to make an example of any that show independence. If liberals could they'd tie him to a post in the Capitol, strip him, and horsewhip on camera till he bled.