SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alan Smithee who wrote (364888)5/17/2010 6:38:14 PM
From: mph3 Recommendations  Respond to of 793914
 
That's only because he is a dreamer like many hard core leftists. They believe at some level that all this socialism, with a fascist back [which is really what Allen is suggesting], will make the world a rosy, kumbaya singing, happy go lucky place...if only people would cooperate! [dammit!--lol]

And so long as no one tells HIM what to do.

It is a joke to hear any opinion from an immoral almost-child molester, who can't even manage his own personal life, no matter how many decent movies he was able to make.

Movies come out the way the director directs.

To think that giving an inexperienced narcissist like BHO his head for a few years would have a happy ending is like thinking that letting Allen adopt children is a good idea.



To: Alan Smithee who wrote (364888)5/17/2010 6:38:57 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793914
 
"It would be good if he could be a dictator for a few years because he could do a lot of good things quickly."

When has any dictator given up power after a few years? Hasn't the last century taught everyone the dangers of dictatorship?

Woody Allen is "supposed" to be an intelligent person. So why did he say such a DUMB thing? Does liberalism turn off the mind or something?