SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: T L Comiskey who wrote (80187)5/17/2010 7:02:11 PM
From: Broken_Clock2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
He makes a good point tho...

Those who practice, er... teach law in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. -g-



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (80187)5/17/2010 10:11:38 PM
From: stockman_scott1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
How We Wrecked The Oceans, with Jeremy Jackson

dailykos.com



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (80187)5/18/2010 4:07:31 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Ted Turner: Is God speaking in Gulf Coast spill?

religion.blogs.cnn.com



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (80187)5/18/2010 4:57:09 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Researchers Ponder a Hurricane Hitting the Oil-Slicked Gulf of Mexico

By LAUREN MORELLO of ClimateWire

May 17, 2010 -- The Atlantic Ocean hurricane season begins June 1, and scientists tracking the Gulf of Mexico oil spill are beginning to think about what would happen if a storm hit the growing slick.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration won't release its initial hurricane season forecast until Thursday, but experts said it would only take one storm in the Gulf to complicate the ongoing effort to stanch the gushing oil and limit its environmental impact.

NOAA talking points list a number of open questions, such as whether the oil plume could affect storm formation by suppressing evaporation of Gulf water and how a hurricane could change the size and location of the oil slick. There's little information about what would happen if a hurricane hit the spill, experts said.

Still, several scientists are worried that a hurricane could drive oil inland, soiling beaches and wetlands and pushing polluted water up river estuaries.

"My 'oh, no' thought is that a hurricane would pick up that oil and move it, along with salt, up into interior regions of the state that I am convinced the oil will not reach otherwise," said Robert Twilley, an oceanographer at Louisiana State University.

"The bottom line is, how much oil are we going to get into our wetlands? We don't know," he said. "This thing is gushing out in these huge numbers."

That's a question that Florida State University researchers Steven Morey and Dmitry Dukhovskoy are trying to answer with computer models of storm surge and ocean currents.

A somewhat mixed picture

"The storm could potentially transport the oil over some distance, we're not sure how far," said Morey, a physical oceanographer. "It could maybe break up the masses of the oil, through mixing. And it could also cause oil to wash over the land in a storm surge."

He and Dukhovskoy hope to have initial results by the time the storm season begins in roughly two weeks. But first they must tweak their computer models to take oil's physical properties into account.

"Oil on water changes the stress on the water from the winds," Morey said. "Oil will essentially slide over the water and change the roughness of the water. That's why we call it an oil slick. ... The waves present a technical challenge, as well."

But Dukhovskoy said he believes the hardest problem might be predicting the size and location of the slick at the beginning of hurricane season, so the scientists can feed it into their computer models.

While the government hasn't released its initial predictions for this year's hurricane season, other experts expect an active year.

Last month, Colorado State University forecasters Bill Gray and Phil Klotzbach said they "continue to see above-average activity for the 2010 Atlantic hurricane season." The pair are betting that warm ocean temperatures and a weakening El Niño will produce 15 named storms, including eight hurricanes. Half of those, they say, will be major hurricanes -- classified as Category 4 or 5.

An above-average hurricane year

Another hurricane watcher, AccuWeather meteorologist Joe Bastardi, puts that number even higher. He foresees 16 to 18 named storms, and believes this year's hurricane season is in line with those of 1998, 2008 and the record-setting 2005 season, which produced hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Emily and Dennis, among others.

Back in Louisiana, Robert Twilley is thinking about the worst-case scenario and hoping that if Louisiana's wetlands are hit, they'll continue their remarkable recent streak of recovering from natural disasters.

In 2000, a drought in the southeastern United States turned 100,000 acres of Louisiana's wetlands into mud flats, or "brown marsh." In 2005, hurricanes Katrina and Rita carried Gulf water deep into the wetlands. Slow to drain out, the salty water dried out the marshes, Twilley said.

In both cases, scientists saw signs of recovery within a year. But there's no formula for predicting how resilient the Gulf Coast's beaches and wetlands might be in the face of an oil spill-hurricane one-two punch. And any recovery would come in the face of the ongoing wetlands loss from human intervention like canals and other earthworks that prevent silt from replenishing the coastal marshes. Louisiana now loses approximately 15 square miles of wetlands each year.

"These systems will recover," Twilley said. "It's going to be the length of time that's uncertain. And the important thing is, what happens in the meantime? What services do the wetlands provide the state of Louisiana? Fisheries, flood control, nutrient removal, habitat for ducks and nesting birds."

Copyright 2010 E&E Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

For more news on energy and the environment, visit www.climatewire.net.



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (80187)5/18/2010 2:10:39 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 89467
 
U.S. Minerals Service Sued Over Whistleblower Claims (Update4)

By Laurel Brubaker Calkins

May 17 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Minerals Management Service failed to act on a whistleblower’s warnings that a BP Plc oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico lacked safety and engineering documentation, an environmental watchdog said.

Food & Water Watch filed a suit today asking a U.S. judge to force MMS, which oversees mineral production on federal lands and the Outer Continental Shelf, to shut down London-based BP’s Atlantis platform until the company can prove the system, one of the Gulf’s largest, was built according to engineer-certified designs and is operating safely.

The Atlantis, which can produce 200,000 barrels of oil and 180 million cubic feet of gas daily, is located about 100 miles south of the runaway well damaged by last month’s sinking of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, which was leased by BP. The blowout well has already spilled more than 4 million gallons of crude into the nation’s second-largest fishery since the sinking occurred April 20.

“It is inconceivable that BP could justify the risk of commissioning Atlantis production without completed design documentation,” Mike Sawyer, an independent safety engineer with Apex Safety Consultants of Houston, said in an affidavit provided to MMS last year. Sawyer was hired to analyze evidence former BP contractor Kenneth Abbott provided to the environmental group.

Absence of Documents

“The absence of a complete set of final, up-to-date, ‘as- built’ engineering documents, including appropriate engineering approval, introduces substantial risk of large scale damage to the deepwater Gulf of Mexico environment and harm to workers,” Sawyer said in his statement.

The Minerals Management Service had no immediate comment on the lawsuit.

BP believes the accusations in the MMS lawsuit are unsubstantiated, spokesman Scott Dean said. “We are aware that the MMS is conducting an investigation in connection with past allegations made about our Atlantis platform,” he said in an e-mail today. “We will continue to cooperate fully with their requests for information.”

Abbott, who supervised BP’s Atlantis engineering documentation database, took what he said are internal BP e-mails and a copy of the platform’s documentation database when he left the company in February 2009. He supplied his materials in March 2009 to the environmental group, which pressed MMS to investigate Abbott’s concerns at least three times last year, according to Kate Fried, Food & Water Watch’s spokeswoman.

Design Specs

One of Abbott’s e-mails, dated about a year after the platform went online in 2007, showed a BP manager warning that incomplete and unapproved design specifications had been given to platform operators in violation of federal law and the company’s own safety policies.

“This could lead to catastrophic operator errors due to their assuming the drawing is correct,” Barry Duff, then an Atlantis project manager in BP’s Houston operations headquarters, said in an Aug. 15, 2008, message. “There are hundreds if not thousands of subsea documents that have never been finalized, yet the facilities have been turned over” to operators who rely on the design specs to safely operate Atlantis, he said.

Thunder Horse

Sawyer, the safety engineer who analyzed Abbott’s evidence for the environmental group, said Atlantis’s purported lack of engineer-certified and “as-built” design specifications “may result in failures as simple as installing a check valve backwards. Yet, a check valve positioned backwards is alleged to have resulted in the near-sinking of the BP Thunder Horse platform.”

BP had to delay production from Thunder Horse, the Gulf’s largest offshore facility, after the platform listed dangerously following a 2005 hurricane that revealed problems with the platform’s ballast system.

Offshore platforms are permanent installations, fixed to the sea floor, that are used to produce oil and gas from multiple wells that were initially discovered by drilling rigs, which are mobile. The BP Atlantis, located in waters too deep for a conventional seabed-based platform, is the world’s deepest moored semisubmersible or floating production platform, according to BP’s website.

Semisubmersible

The Deepwater Horizon, which was owned by Transocean Ltd. and under contract to BP at the time it exploded and sank last month, was one of the world’s largest semisubmersible drilling rigs.

“The catastrophic Deepwater Horizon spill would be ‘a mere drop in the bucket’ when compared to the potential size of a spill from the BP Atlantis,” lawyers for the environmental group said in today’s court filing.

BP said in a statement today that the company’s own 2009 investigation into the whistleblower’s claims “found that the operators on the platform had full access to the accurate, up- to-date drawings (topsides, hull and subsea) necessary to operate the platform safely.’’

The company said its ombudsman made a second investigation into the same allegations, which was “focused on project document and filing procedures and had no bearing on operating or regulatory issues. After this review BP made some procedural changes in the project execution plan, but these likewise had no connection with the safe operation of the platform.’’

‘Completely Erroneous’

“It is completely erroneous to suggest that the minor internal process issue we identified and immediately amended last year on the Atlantis platform’’ diminishes BP Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward’s commitment to “clear, safe and reliable operations’’ as BP’s top priority, the company said in the statement.

At Food & Water Watch’s urging in February, 19 U.S. congressmen asked MMS to investigate Abbott’s allegations about Atlantis’s documentation deficiencies. The agency said it would issue a report on its findings by May. Eileen Angelico, in MMS’s New Orleans office, confirmed in a brief interview last month that the agency’s Atlantis investigation is slated to be made public sometime this month. Wenonah Hauter, Food & Water Watch’s executive director, said she filed the lawsuit after being “unable to rouse officials at the MMS to do their jobs.”

“We’re asking President Obama to step up and order MMS to shut down BP Atlantis until it can be proven to be safe,” she said today at a New Orleans press conference announcing a television campaign to pressure the government to step up inspections of all deepwater oil and gas production facilities, “beginning with ones operated by BP.”

Tip of Iceberg

“We think Atlantis is just the tip of the iceberg,” Mikal Watts, Food & Water Watch’s attorney, said at the press conference. “We just happen to have information about the Atlantis.”

Abbott, who claims he was laid off for pressing BP to address the lack of “as built” drawings, said he was “dismayed” to hear BP Americas chairman Lamar McKay tell Congress last week that the lack of up-to-date drawings for the Deepwater Horizon’s blowout prevention equipment delayed BP’s response to that disaster. “They wasted half a day trying to shut off a valve that was already disconnected,” Abbott told reporters today.

Last week, a different environmental group sent MMS a formal notice of its intent to sue the agency within 60 days for allegedly approving offshore drilling activities without regard to their potential impact on endangered marine species.

The case is Abbott v. Salazar, 4:10-cv-01759, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas (Houston).

To contact the reporter on this story: Laurel Brubaker Calkins in Houston at laurel@calkins.us.com.

Last Updated: May 17, 2010 19:15 EDT