Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (566990)	5/18/2010 3:59:23 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Respond to of 1583373

Inode, > I don't think they believe it is a low-tax state; rather, they believe that government confiscation and redistribution of ALL or NEARLY all private funds is acceptable. I guess that puts Alghieri's "tax-obsessed" phrase in the proper perspective: Message 26538402 Kind of hard not to be "tax-obsessed" when CA's unemployment is still around 12%, the business climate here is the worst in America, and people are opting to move to regions with harsher climates. Of course, when called out on it, what does he do? Go back to blaming Bush: siliconinvestor.com > But for different reasons -- Al would exempt himself from the provision, while tejek would be a recipient of the redistribution. It's these bozos who continue to steer the discussion away from what's vital, and that is the obvious direction our country is headed. Europe should be the biggest warning sign to them, yet all they do is continue to obsess about Bush, Rush, and FOX. Tenchusatsu