Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HPilot who wrote (84290)	5/20/2010 9:40:02 AM
From: Sedohr Nod	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224729

I call poster offsides, since it's grossly unfair to think about the future pollution consequences of going green....we are only allowed to feel really smug and superior about it. Rational thought is not allowed on the subject. It's like a stretch of two freeways near here that are separated by about 5 miles.....connecting the two roads would have saved countless hours of travel time and probably millions of gallons of gas over the last ten years(not to mention the future).....but no, there is the last habitat of some useless bug in the way....totally irrational and retarded.

To: HPilot who wrote (84290)	5/20/2010 9:53:05 AM
From: chartseer	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

oh bummer! me thinks the weight of those batteries would make them inefficient for flight. They would not be as green as the rubber band powered planes or even the gliders. Kennedy had similar problems with his atomic powered bomber which could not have lead shields and flight. Hence there was also a problem with radiation which meant they had to be flown by remote control. What I could never understand was why didn't they use the atomic engine of the kennedy atomic bomber to generate power for tesla's flying saucer? of course you would still have the problems of flight with lead shields and the waste disposal of the atomic waste. You still would have a remote control flying saucer. I can even imagine our flying saucers firing laser beams at the taliban and such. I always thought the backside of the moon would be the best place for us to dispose of our atomic waste. Especially since the moon is moving away from the earth at the rate of an inch a year. Maybe eventually the weight of the atomic waste would stop or slow the moons departure? I cannot imagine a stable world without our moon! Don;t worry! Be happy! the hopeless comrade chartseer in the green era.