Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (405371)	5/21/2010 9:25:25 AM
From: Real Man	Respond to of 436258

Of course. Write a Monte Carlo code for simulating the derivative stuff. They exist. U using one? -g- I am surprised that you of all people don't believe the existence of non-linear feedback loop inside the swan that is only broken by the monetary authorities. How is that statistics?

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (405371)	5/21/2010 9:43:42 AM
From: Real Man	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Statistics would only be applicable in the absence of derivative bubble. Otherwise either the Fed stops the crash or the crash blows out the Fed? In the latter case we have a SHTF situation.

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (405371)	5/22/2010 10:11:04 AM
From: Real Man	Respond to of 436258

Since when did this thread stop trying to call a derivative meltdown? Since the pyramid reached 1 quadrillion and did not melt in 2008? We were trying to call and play the derivative crash since the 90-s. So, now you say our derivative crash is an improbable outlier? <G> What do you do when a nuclear meltdown hits? I try to get the hell hundred of miles away, or wrap myself in white and crawl toward the nearest cemetery. Yes, I am concerned. The Ponzi just got too big for EU to handle, and folks are starting to connect the dots. <G>