Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (567444)	5/21/2010 3:57:20 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576881

"It's really hypocritical for someone who is opposed to controlling illegal immigration, as Arizona is trying to do, to say that." It sure is, tejek is not to be taken serious. We are witness to the passage of historic periods where slavery was a legitimate institution to modern times where we have transitioned into a model culture of successful and healthy race relations in America. People like tejek would destroy that if they could, and some day they may. tejek's continual stream of negative racial stereo types based on human bondage and forced labor is too hypocritical given his complete dismissal of the same human injustices attached to the issue and practices tied to illegal immigration. Illegal immigration is at the foundation of human trafficking. Human trafficking is now a 33billion dollar a year industry, and according to the US State Department it includes 12.3 million adult and child victims at any given moment in time according to the US state department. "Human trafficking is a multi-dimensional issue. It is a crime that deprives people of their human rights and freedoms, increases global health risks, fuels growing networks of organized crime, and can sustain levels of poverty and impede development in certain areas. The impacts of human trafficking are devastating. Victims may suffer physical and emotional abuse, rape, threats against self and family, and even death. But the devastation also extends beyond individual victims; human trafficking undermines the health, safety, and security of all nations it touches." Read more: america.gov

To: Brumar89 who wrote (567444)	5/21/2010 4:23:32 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576881

the feds were trying to stop it. If you knew more history, you'd know that wasn't the case. The Republican party did favor emancipation and was founded with emancipation as a party plank, but the Lincoln administration didn't try to force abolition on the south before the civil war. In fact, the pro-slavery forces were if anything too successful in defending slavery in the courts and in the Congress in the decade or so before the war ..... Dred Scott and the Fugitive Slave Act threatened to de facto spread slavery into the north. If a slave owner could bring his slave to the north and keep him a slave that effectively made all the states slave states. Lincoln was right - there were two legal systems, one based on slavery and one based on freedom and it was getting increasingly hard to maintain the union half one thing and half the other. Eventually the war resolved it. Wars solve conflicts if they're fought to the end. I never said a word about the GOP. It was a fight between the North and the South......not the Dems and the Rs. It would be nice to think the South was failing economically because of slavery but it wasn't. Slave prices had been rising for decades. Slavery worked economically. The problem with it was the inhumanity. You're missing the point. It was a false economy based on the subjegation of an entire people. It would have failed at some point.......either the slaves would have risen up or as the rest of the world became more mechanized and could things more cheaply.....and better or undermining by the North. And now we face the same problem with illegals. A false economy has developed in the SW, the West coast and TX....and now its spreading to other states. We have to stop it before it fukks up the country. It's really hypocritical for someone who is opposed to controlling illegal immigration, as Arizona is trying to do, to say that. The Democrats are becoming more and more openly pro-illegal immigration as a party. Obama officials are even saying they won't enforce the immigration laws in Arizona. Who told you I am opposed to controlling illegal immigration? I strongly support its control but by the feds, not AZ and its likely unconstitutional law: Message 26555480 Message 26554985