Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10651)	5/23/2010 8:46:47 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 24225

B.C. industry offered $80 million to save energy Four-year Power Smart program targets conservation BC Hydro expects to recoup $120 million on an $80-million investment in a new Power Smart program for industrial customers. Hydro is offering to pay its industrial customers up to 100 per cent of the cost of energy-efficient investments under $1 million, and up to 75 per cent of the cost of projects over $1 million. Hydro has only a few dozen large industrial customers, but they collectively account for one-third of the electricity consumed each year in British Columbia -- about the same amount as each of the residential and commercial customer groups. [...] The provincial government recently introduced legislation compelling Hydro to meet 66 per cent of all new growth in electricity demand by 2020 through conservation rather than building or contracting new generation facilities. That's up from the previous target of 50 per cent. Hydro calculates that the four-year program will save enough electricity to meet annual power needs of 20,000 homes. See: edmontonjournal.com. And on a related note... Saving Energy Means Getting the South on Board Coal-fueled region uses more energy per capita and pays less for it than the U.S. overall. The American South is not known for its energy conservation. Coal is plentiful, and electricity is cheap. Washington, D.C., and 16 Southern states from Delaware to Texas use 44 percent of the total energy consumed in the United States but account for only 36 percent of the country’s population. The South is responsible for 41 percent of U.S. carbon emissions. [...] Aggressive energy efficiency policies “could set the South on a course toward a more sustainable and prosperous energy future,” the report said. If adopted, it said, the policies would create about 520,000 new “green” jobs by 2030, and the economy would grow by $1 billion — a small but important boost in a region with the highest proportion of poor households in the U.S. Finally, 20 billion gallons of water could be saved by 2030, or 45 percent of the projected growth in demand for water in the South, because it would not be needed for cooling systems at future new power plants, the report said. By 2030, the water savings are estimated to reach 90 billion gallons. See: miller-mccune.com.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (10651)	5/23/2010 10:10:06 PM
From: average joe	Respond to of 24225

Fraser Institute warns of proposed mining law 2010-05-20 20:06 ET - Street Wire by Fred McMahon and Jean-Francois Minardi of the Fraser Institute A Liberal private member's bill with serious economic consequences for the mining sector is making its way through Parliament. Bill C-300 seeks to regulate the business activities of Canadian-owned mining companies operating in other countries. The rationale for the bill is based on false premises, unproven accusations and the misguided notion of corporate social responsibility, also known as CSR. In an April 15 speech to support the bill, Liberal MP John McKay insinuated that Canadian mining and oil and gas exploration companies behave badly abroad, abusing human rights and the environment. However, Mr. McKay provided no evidence, other than a laundry list of unproved charges levelled against the Canadian mining industry by politically active foreign-based, non-governmental organizations. Supporters of Bill C-300 claim the legislation would ensure that Canadian corporations engaged in mining, oil or gas activities behave in a manner consistent with international environmental best practices and with Canada's commitments to international human rights standards. In reality, the bill is a solution looking for a problem. The mining industry itself has already adopted practices that mirror the principles behind CSR, not because of a government imposed set of rules, but because it has economic incentives to do so. As a document on the website of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada states, "The business value of CSR is that it can help safeguard license to operate; facilitate access to capital; contribute to reputation, and enhance stakeholder engagement, including with employees." Mining companies create enormous socio-economic benefits from their business activities. The best social program of all is a job and prosperity for families. Policy makers should beware of the alternatives. Discouraging mining by raising the costs of doing business risks the loss of the economic benefits that accrue to people in developing countries: less mining means fewer jobs. Mining companies also typically pay above average wages in local labour markets, often supplying health care and education benefits for employees as well. Bill C-300 has little to do with improving corporate behavior but a lot to do with anti-mining ideology. Here is some history. In 2006, the Canadian government initiated the national round table process on CSR and Canadian extractive industries in developing countries with different stakeholders. As a result, an advisory group prepared and delivered a consensus report in March, 2007, calling on the government to create a comprehensive framework. The government's response to the report was the publication, in March, 2009, of a strategy for the Canadian international extractive sector. However, some NGOs were not happy with the outcome. To quote Mining Watch: "The government's response is highly inadequate as it contains no effective complaints mechanism and no possibility of sanctions for companies not complying with voluntary guidelines. Bill C-300 remedies these flaws." If the bill is passed, the federal government will have the power to investigate complaints made against Canadian resource companies operating abroad, regardless of whether the complaints come from Canadian citizens or citizens of the nation in which such activities are alleged to have occurred or are occurring. If the companies are found to be responsible for human rights or environmental abuses, they could be denied Canadian government funding from Export Development Canada and investment from the Canada Pension Plan. Bill C-300 will effectively allow anti-mining NGOs to paralyze mining exploration and development by launching a never-ending stream of complaints and investigations. It will not matter whether or not the allegations are unfounded. When one is dealt with, another can be dreamed up. Bill C-300 turns the concept of justice on its head. Mining companies will bear the consequences of false accusations. It will be a legal nightmare for the mining industry which would have to deal with undue damage to its reputation and significant expenditures for its defence. Meanwhile, NGOs will suffer no costs for making false charges. Bad laws often have disastrous consequences for the economy and Bill C-300 is no exception. Mining and exploration companies based in Canada account for 43 per cent of global exploration expenditures and in 2008, more than 75 per cent of the world's exploration and mining companies were headquartered in Canada. Yet, Bill C-300 will deter Canadian-based mining companies from investing abroad because of the uncertainty of the mining projects and their limited ability to attract investment. The result will likely be the flight of mining companies out of Canada. Mining companies will face powerful economic incentives to relocate to jurisdictions without such legal burdens. This is neither good for Canada or for poor people in developing nations for whom mining can be a route out of poverty and into hope for the future, just as it was for Canadians in the early phases of our national economic development. Fred McMahon is vice-president of research at the Fraser Institute. Jean-Francois Minardi is a senior policy analyst with the Fraser Institute. stockwatch.comCURRENT-1723710&symbol=CURRENT&news_region=C