Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Snowshoe who wrote (63809)	5/24/2010 2:54:02 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 219578

For this post you are rewarded with the boys willy photo

To: Snowshoe who wrote (63809)	5/24/2010 3:48:26 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219578

<<It's amusing that you and Elmat talk so much about USA. Why not tell us more in-depth stuff about China and Brazil?>> ... what do you think i have been telling you about? mongolia? no, china. ... what do you believe elmat has been telling you about? colombia? no, brazil. <<Oh well, here's what Chanos is short per Elroy's link... Message 26458295 >> do not know of any publicly traded china (as opposed to hong kong) real estate developer that would have the volume for anyone remotely serious about shorting to short and cover of those traded, rule of thumb would be a 20% decline ytd, hardly a crash, unless one also what happened to google a crash as to building material companies, any global large cap would be a global supplier as opposed to china supplier, say boral of australia finance.yahoo.com and it is not clear any shorter made money doing boral given the 20% rule of thumb on declines year to date on anything flavored with china, perhaps best to have shorted any number of usa shares instead it is a very different thing for chanos to claim china be a bubble when the bubble is in companies who supply china. if china was a bubble and the bubble has popped, than my news for you is gad, there is a labour shortage and the restaurants are full, and luxury goods sales are healthy ... etc etc

To: Snowshoe who wrote (63809)	5/24/2010 4:27:08 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 219578

I don´t talk. I go there and have a look myself. Message 26527518

To: Snowshoe who wrote (63809)	2/1/2011 8:03:18 AM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219578

Stocks are poised to outperform gold going forward. That is the surprising new prediction from none other than Richard Russell, editor of Dow Theory Letters. But what makes his forecast surprising is not its content; it’s that he was the one making it. That’s because, for many months now, Russell has been bearish on the stock market and “buy-and-hold” bullish on gold. What made Russell change his mind: His belief that dividend-paying blue-chip stocks are themselves good inflation hedges. And while he remains bullish on gold too, because it also is such a good inflation hedge, he thinks there is the distinct possibility that blue-chip stocks will do even better in coming weeks and months. marketwatch.com