Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (43393)	5/24/2010 3:02:49 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

There you go again with those 'implications' that only you can see, Tim! No the implications logically inherent in the statement. And I'm not just boldly asserting that this is so, I demonstrated why, a fact that you just ignore. Once again, if the higher deficits are BECAUSE OF the spending cuts, than the spending cuts would have had to reduce revenue more than they decreased spending, because otherwise the deficits would not be higher. I think your intelligent enough to grasp that point, so I wonder why you continue to ignore it.