SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (75865)5/24/2010 5:39:41 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
"What is the goal of saying the same thing over and over again."
He's trying to get you to vote for Palin next time.

Here's one he's missed. Won't plug the well, tho.

Did the GOP hamper Obama administration oversight of oil drilling?
May 24, 2010
Most of the blame for the BP oil disaster rests with BP, Big Oil, and its strong-arm supporters in Congress for the voluntary, “trust us,” self-regulation we have today (see St. Petersburg Times: “It’s becoming increasingly evident that self-regulation has not worked”). Some of the blame certainly resides with the Minerals Management Service, which became absurdly cozy with the industry under the Cheney-Bush administration (see “Flashback to 2008 MMS sex-for-oil scandal“).

That doesn’t let the Obama administration off the hook entirely. In theory they could have cleaned up the MMS from day one, but in practice Republicans made that task infinitely harder.

Newsweek’s Howard Fineman spelled out some of the key background on MSNBC a couple weeks ago (starting around minute 5:55):

Olbermann: The BP shareholder who sued the company today, claiming that BP was knowingly cutting safety costs in violation of the commitments after the Texas refinery blast- Texas city. And spending $16 million to lobby against tougher regulation, by which I mean fight against any regulation. How long is that Bush era voluntary self-regulation regime going to last now?

Fineman: Well I think it’s going to end because its got to end. And I think that’s clear. What happened here is that BP presented a plan for drilling this deep well that was based on an earlier environmental impact statement of the whole Gulf of Mexico that was done under the Bush administration. And said “hey, the Bushies said it was fine, please approve this.” And the person at the Minerals Management Service that was supposed to take a close look at it said “Well, ok, if the overall plan was approved for the whole Gulf and it won’t cause serious environmental dangers then ill approve this specific one.” He basically waved the thing on through last April and now you see the result. As the Democrats I was talking to pointed out, there is a total conflict between what they said in that application for the lease, namely that they had systems that could control any damage that would happen, and what BP and Halliburton and everybody else is saying now which is “we’re trying everything because this is all a new thing to us.”

Okay, but could the new senior political appointees at Interior have done more in March 2009 to block BP’s drilling plan (which was sent in to MMS late February and approved in early April)?

Well, first, it’s worth pointing out that the Transocean platform had a very good safety record until this disaster, as 60 Minutes reported:

… the Deepwater Horizon cost $350 million, rose 378 feet from bottom to top. Both advanced and safe, none of her 126 crew had been seriously injured in seven years.

The safety record was remarkable, because offshore drilling today pushes technology with challenges matched only by the space program.

That was, of course, until BP got heavily involved in the details of the cementing process and testing in order to save a few bucks (see “Should you believe anything BP says?).

So I am not certain that this particular drilling plan would have had any obvious red flags — unless, of course, the handful of senior political appointees at Interior around in early 2009 were simply prepared to stop all new drilling.

CAPAF’s Tom Kenworthy has more background on how the GOP made such a scenario extremely unlikely:

You would think that in the wake of the catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil spill that the petroleum industry’s water carriers in Congress would at least tamp down their “drill, baby drill” nonsense for a while. But not even what threatens to become the biggest environmental disaster in U.S. history keeps those oil-soaked lawmakers from their self-appointed rounds.

Ten days after the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig killed 11 workers and the failure of the rig’s blowout preventer began a gusher of millions of gallons of crude oil into the Gulf, Sens. Robert Bennett (R-UT) and John Barrasso (R-WY) informed Department of Interior secretary Ken Salazar that they would introduce legislation to speed up oil and gas development on federal lands in the West and short-circuit the more thorough environmental reviews Salazar has undertaken.

“We remain deeply concerned by the major changes you proposed in January 2010 to the onshore oil and natural gas leasing program and its impact on communities in Utah and Wyoming,” the senators wrote. “As we have discussed with you on a number of occasions, oil and natural gas production is very important to the nation and particularly our states.”

This isn’t the first time Bennett and other western Republicans have interfered with the Obama administration’s ability to properly regulate oil and gas development. In early 2009 Bennett and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) blocked the confirmation of David Hayes, Salazar’s choice to be deputy secretary of the Interior Department. Their beef: Salazar had cancelled 77 oil and gas lease sales on western lands that had been drummed up in the last days of the Bush administration as a final gift to Big Oil, even though many of the parcels were close to some of Utah’s most iconic landscapes, including Arches and Canyonlands national parks.

As deputy secretary, Hayes is in charge of many day-to-day operations at Interior. He has been vital to the Obama administration’s response to the Gulf oil spill, and was on the scene on day two of the disaster.

Also last year, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), slowed down confirmation of two other key Interior officials, assistant secretary for land and minerals Wilma Lewis and Bureau of Land Management director Bob Abbey over concerns about legislation for an Arizona land swap. Lewis oversees the Minerals Management Service that regulates offshore oil development; Abbey’s BLM oversees onshore energy development.

During the Bush administration, as Salazar has noted, Interior became a “candy store” for the oil and gas industry. Between fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2009, the department approved nearly 42,000 drilling permits on federal lands, nearly two and a half times the pace of the previous eight years.

Salazar, to his credit, put a stop to this open season assault on the West. Not only did he block the 77 Utah oil and gas leases pending further review, but he put the brakes on the Bush administration’s rush to develop oil shale deposits in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming so their impacts on western water and other natural resources could be better understood. He moved to clean up the scandal-soaked Minerals Management Service. And after a probe by the Government Accountability Office found that the Bush administration policy of short-circuiting environmental reviews of oil and gas leasing decisions did not comply with the law, he instituted a new approach that will make the government look before it leaps into Big Oil’s arms. Oil and gas interests, he said, “do not own the nation’s public lands; taxpayers do.”

The Interior Department holds much of the responsibility for assuring that the nation’s oil and gas resources are developed in an environmentally responsible manner. As the GAO noted in a 2005 investigation, the department’s “ability to meet its environmental mitigation responsibilities for oil and gas development has been lessened by a dramatic increase in oil and gas operations on federal lands….”

But that dramatic increase – there are now some 32 million acres of federal lands that have been leased but not yet developed by the oil and gas industry – isn’t enough for Sens. Bennett and Barrasso.

Salazar’s policies, said Bennett in a news release, “would add new bureaucracy and red tape to the oil and gas leasing program and significantly lengthen the amount of time before energy production could begin.”

Given what’s happening in the Gulf, a little more red tape and bureaucracy would be welcome.

So while team Obama could no doubt have done more, and I suppose one can construct scenario where they could have stopped this thing a mere two months after they came into office with one hand tied behind their backs by the GOP, in fact, it remains clear that the blame for the BP oil disaster rests with BP, the entire industry, and its strong-arm supporters in Congress for the voluntary, “trust us,” self-regulation we have today.
climateprogress.org



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (75865)5/24/2010 5:52:42 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 149317
 
Construction industry builds up steam, adds 14,000 jobs

The U.S. figures for April mark the first back-to-back monthly gains in that sector since 2006. California still sees a drop in the industry's workforce but at a slower pace.

By Alana Semuels, Los Angeles Times
May 24, 2010

The drills, saws and sanders that fell silent during the economic slowdown are beginning to whir again. For the first time in years, U.S. builders are hiring laborers.

The nation's construction industry added 14,000 jobs nationwide in April, according to the Labor Department, marking the first back-to-back monthly gains in that sector since 2006.

In all, 29 states gained construction jobs that month, according to data released Friday by the Associated General Contractors of America. The U.S. industry has been bolstered in part by federal stimulus funds for infrastructure and the slow but steady improvement in the housing market.

Although building jobs have not yet begun to pick up in California, the industry here is showing improvement. The value of permits in California's private building industry totaled $2.2 billion in March 2010, up 8.1% from the same period last year and 29% from February, according to the Construction Industry Research Board. The number of residential building permits issued in the first three months of the year was up 29% from the same period last year.

That's a relief to industry veterans such as John Sourapas, 55, of Fullerton, who is back on the job after 10 months of unemployment.

On a recent afternoon at a site in Irvine, the construction supervisor checked blueprints inside a trailer as activity buzzed around him. Men wearing masks laid bricks while others hammered nails onto the rooftops of new homes, their yellow hardhats framed against a bright blue sky. A bulldozer cleared dirt on what would soon become the street of a subdivision.

"I was ready to go back to work," Sourapas said.

Times are still tough in California, which lost nearly 400,000 construction jobs since the 2006 peak. Although the state lost 1,900 jobs in April, that was still considered good news because the loss was a lot less than in previous months.

Sluggishness in California's construction industry could continue for the rest of the year, which means the state's economic recovery will lag behind the rest of the nation, said Esmael Adibi, an economist at Chapman University in Orange. Although construction jobs make up only about 5% of the state's nonfarm workforce, the sector has a large multiplier effect, meaning that money spent on building helps boost sales of furniture, appliances and other goods and services.

"Can we recover without construction?" Adibi said. "Yes, we could. But it's not going to be a strong recovery."

Still, the Orange County site where Sourapas' employer, New Home Co., is building 31 houses is no anomaly. With inventory of existing homes shrinking and home prices stabilizing, builders are breaking ground on new projects. The Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index of home prices in 20 metropolitan areas posted a 0.6% gain in February of 2010 from the previous year, the first year-over-year gain in more than three years. In March, the median price paid for a home in California jumped 14.3% over the same month in 2009, MDA DataQuick said.

"We believe we have reached some kind of a bottom, which gives us confidence to start new projects, knowing the prices aren't going to continue falling," said Mark Buckland, president of City Ventures, a home builder with three projects and a total of 69 units under construction in San Diego and Santa Ana.

Public works have also received a boost from federal stimulus spending. In California, 516 transportation projects worth $2.5 billion have been awarded contracts to begin work. Every $1 billion spent on transportation projects supports 18,000 jobs, said Matt Rocco, a Caltrans spokesman. Nationwide, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act set aside $27.5 billion for highway and bridge projects, said Ken Simonson, chief economist at Associated General Contractors of America.

"Most contractors are singing the blues unless they have won a stimulus project," he said.

The slowdown has been tough on laborers such as Jesus Perales, a hardscape foreman who was on unemployment for six months before he started working in Irvine in February.

"Now I can pay my bills, and pay the bills that I missed," Perales said. The 52-year-old said his wife's factory job supported the family when he was jobless. Now that he's drawing a paycheck, he can help with his daughter's beauty school tuition.

For many of those working, however, hours are shorter and pay is lower. In California, the hourly wages of workers in the construction industry have fallen 11% from their peak.

"With some of these jobs, I could have made more on unemployment," said plumber Salvador Madrigal, a subcontractor working on the same site as Sourapas.

Just a few years ago, competition for experienced hands was fierce. Riverside concrete subcontractor Martinez Construction covered housing expenses for its employees working on projects in Arizona and Nevada, said president Dave Martinez. Now, Martinez has postponed expansion and cut salaries at his company 10%.

Dave Keehmer, of Keehmer's Construction in Whittier, used to do major home remodels. Now, hardly any job is too small. He recently put in what he thought was a low bid — $5,900 — to do work on a bathroom remodel. The winner bid $3,900.

"A number of companies seem to be underbidding contracts, to a degree that their prices don't seem fathomable," said Brad Diede, chief executive of the California Professional Assn. of Specialty Contractors.

He said some are cutting costs by paying workers off the books to avoid payroll tax and shorting them on overtime or taking safety shortcuts. In March, Cal/OSHA halted work at a construction site in Riverside after it found that the employer didn't provide proper safety equipment. California's labor commissioner recently sued a Florida contractor for wage violations on a project in Pacifica.

Frustrated over sporadic employment and sometimes poor working conditions, some workers have left the industry. Alvaro Castillon, a supervisor with First Quality Painting in Chino, said about half the painters he worked with regularly had left the area or moved into other fields. About 30% of the contractors that New Home Co. supervisor Pat Dibble used to work with have gone out of business. Brent Brinlee, a vice president at Hakes Sash & Door in Murrieta, said his company cut 70% of its staff.

Gerardo Hidalgo, a drywall foreman, is just grateful to be back at work.

Taking a lunch break on the building site in Irvine, he said his family of eight can now occasionally eat out and buy nicer things. He's still pinching pennies, though; he ate home-cooked eggs and chiles out of a frying pan that some friends had set up over a portable stove. But he's not complaining.

"We're living much better now, thank God," Hidalgo said. "It was pretty bad."

latimes.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (75865)5/24/2010 8:27:07 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Chinu, I do not even know how to respond to anyone who defends Murdock even a little.

The damage Murdock has done to our civilization and democracy is incalculable.