SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scion who wrote (781)5/26/2010 11:18:42 AM
From: scionRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 53574
 
Do More Transparent Corporate Actions Following a Restatement Influence the SEC’s Decision to Issue an Enforcement Action?

Rebecca L. Files

Texas A&M University
Mays Business School
Accounting Department
460 Wehner, 4353 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843
rfiles@mays.tamu.edu

Current Draft: February 2009

ABSTRACT: This study examines whether corporate transparency about a restatement influences the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) decision to issue an enforcement action. I consider corporate transparency to be higher when firms initiate an independent investigation into the restatement, display the restatement in a more prominent press release location, and/or report the restatement in a more visible SEC filing (i.e., Form 8-K). I find that, on average, greater restatement transparency increases the likelihood of an SEC sanction, after controlling for restatement severity. This result is strongest before the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), where all three proxies for corporate transparency are positive and significant predictors of SEC enforcement actions. After SOX, however, more visible SEC filings decrease the likelihood of an SEC sanction, suggesting that the SEC rewards this type of transparent behavior. In addition, the SEC also rewards corporate transparency by reducing monetary penalties when an enforcement action is issued.

A “misstatement” refers to the incorrect financial report(s) in prior periods, while a “restatement” represents the subsequently disclosed and corrected financial statements.

acctwkshop.cox.smu.edu