Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yard_man who wrote (63886)	5/26/2010 6:58:19 PM
From: benwood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217561

I was too colloquial -- the signal (field) is what goes nearly the speed of light, not any actual electrons. Centimeters/sec doesn't jive with what I've read. I just cracked my quantum physics book and the authors there claim (using the Drude model) 108000 meters/s for electrons in some metal wire, which is pretty slow compared to the speed of light but 1 million times faster than you said but also about 25 times slower than I was inferring. Regardless, that doesn't matter, does it? If you hold the end of a nice fat wire that is 300 million meters long and you are grounded and somebody applies a billion volts charge to the other end you will feel a hole in your body just over one second later. The rest of what I said I do know and stand by. Whether or not a revolution occurs due to reduced overhead created by quantum anything remains to be seen and is likely to be, in my view, a long way off and rather expensive.