Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (43554)	5/28/2010 10:08:59 PM
From: TimF	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

(When you have been repeatedly misreading the actual words that I've used in several of my posts Its not a misreading or a misunderstanding on my part. You said, and I quoted "Hey, you're the guy who said it was 'small'." I even linked to that statement. Message 26561942 But I never said any such thing, so the statement quoted above is flat out wrong. Your not just constructing strawmen to argue against, you keep reconstructing them in your mind after they are shown to be vapor. Multiple times you argued against my supposed claim of "small", multiple times I pointed out that I had actually said "was very small compared to the economy". Then each time you would ignore that point and keep arguing against "small". I find it odd that you would get so worked-up simply because someone else did not 100% subscribe to your each and every opinion or value judgment though.... I'm not that worked up (I've come to expect this type of thing from you and if I let myself get all worked up about it, reading this thread would be hazardous to my health), but to the extent I'm worked up at all, it has absolutely nothing to do with you not sharing my opinions. It has to do with you mis-categorizing my arguments, again, and again, even after being corrected multiple times.