SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (366380)5/28/2010 7:44:02 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793858
 
There's something I don't understand about SestakGate. When you're running for President, like Obama a couple of years ago, he was able to offer Hillary a job as Secretary of State in order to prevent a battle at the convention, since she received more votes in the primaries.

When you're President and running for a second term, like Reagan, you can offer your closest competitor the Vice Presidents job in order to form a team going into the election cycle. In this case, you're a government employee offering a high level position to someone in government service in order to derail their chances of impacting the Presidential race.

However, in the case of Sestak, pundits seem agree it's against the law.

Hence my confusion, why the dual standard?



To: KLP who wrote (366380)5/28/2010 10:53:16 AM
From: Geoff Altman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793858
 
If the feds keep dragging their feet on a assigning a special investigation they might get preempted by Pennsylvania doing their own investigation of Sestak.... Either way they're going to have to face the music.....

Anyone besides me think all this back room stuff with lawyers is anything more than getting everyone involved to parrot the same story?