SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mph who wrote (366515)5/28/2010 11:21:15 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793743
 
Woo!

I guess I'd better admonish the NRA.



To: mph who wrote (366515)5/29/2010 1:00:11 AM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793743
 
But some legal experts say the theft of the cross could actually end up bringing about a quick resolution to the crisis, and render moot the drawn-out legal process.

In 2005, Congress transferred the land on which the cross sits to the Veterans of Foreign Wars in exchange for another piece of land within the preserve. Lower courts struck down that provision, as it was deemed a back-door violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

But without a cross on the property, it could render moot the legal challenges put forward by the American Civil Liberties Union concerning the separation of church and state.

"There's an interesting possibility," said Hiram Sasser, the director of litigation at the Liberty Legal Institute, which is representing the VFW in the case.

"If there's no cross there, does that mean that the land transfer goes through, it becomes property of the VFW, and we can put the cross back up?" he said. "The case could essentially be over."

The ACLU is still vowing to press its case in court, even though the offending cross is no longer there.

foxnews.com

Mojave Desert war cross 'returned'

A cross honouring America's war dead that was stolen from a federal park in the Mojave Desert has been mysteriously replaced or returned.

telegraph.co.uk

* * *