To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (84862 ) 5/29/2010 12:29:51 PM From: longnshort 2 Recommendations Respond to of 224707 So lets go through it, 1) It took Obama 2 months to come up with a response, since the first presser ask about it (there were 13 times Gibbs dodged the question and one from the President) 2) The same day of the Press Conference, after Obama said there was a response to come out soon(?) he met with Bill Clinton for lunch… to keep there stories straight. 3) Sestak announced a middle man or fall guy last night, it was his brother. Even though he said he had talked to the WH. 4) This morning Clinton was announced as the WH’s middle man. The day after Sestak announced his brother even though he stonewalled up until that time. And after Obama and Clinton met in secret. 5) Now both of there responses are in and they want us to believe this. 6) Sestak was asked if it was a “high-ranking job” by Larry Kane (Reporter), Presidential, Non-paying Advisory Board Position is not “high-ranking” and its not a “job.” 7) Even if this was true, that would be a bribe that the WH used Clinton to deliver. (A known liar) 8) If this is a criminal offense by one of Obama’s staffers (Rahm) his not answering would be an accomplice to a crime. 9) Now out, Sestak’s brother and Clinton were invited into the White House before the reports came out, most likely to Consult on the report that came out today. 10) Even left wing news sources and blogs are questioning if what was reported is even legal. Hopefully Rep. Issa will continue to investigate, there is more out there. Sestak’s reported answers of this do not jive with his response. Check their phone records and where they were, Criminal Investigation : americanparchment.com