SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (250987)5/31/2010 11:41:32 AM
From: neolibRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Max, your own description shows why using a nuke is nonsense: You have to drill a "relief well" to place the nuke. The only reason the Russians used nukes was because they didn't have accurate enough drilling technology to drill a real relief well.

The issue is time. If it takes as much time to place a nuke as it does to drill the relief well, why use a nuke which would have risk as well?

All the talk of using a nuke is crap because of this simple fact: It will take as long as drilling a relief well.



To: LTK007 who wrote (250987)5/31/2010 12:30:28 PM
From: microhoogle!Respond to of 306849
 
I'd say, get 15 Rigs, 25 rigs or whatever and suck the reservoir dry quickly while "kink" up the leaky pipe multiple times to reduce the leakage.

Instead of waiting for other options - I think Feds should sideline BP and go all in.

Try ALL Alternatives and ideas at the same time.

PS: Apologize if my ignorance in this arena shows - obviously I don't know anywhere near what many of you know but throwing some wild assed ideas as a concerned citizen.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News