Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RinConRon who wrote (366939)	6/1/2010 10:30:38 AM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793771

Obama, Netanyahu and the Free Gaza flotilla If the Obama administration had been skillful in managing its relationship with the difficult Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu, it would have some room to maneuver in responding to Israel’s disastrous attack on the Free Gaza flotilla. Netanyahu’s decision to use military force to stop boats populated with European and American notables, and, even more, the bloody execution of the operation, are indefensible -- and are being described as such today by Israel’s own press. If there were no cracks in the relationship with Jerusalem, Obama could join in the criticism, while quietly working to restrain the UN Security Council from a lynch-mob-style response, and without casting doubt on the willingness of the U.S. to defend the Jewish state from a growing multitude of enemies. But Obama has not handled Netanyahu well. So the White House’s cautious initial response to the incident -- even as Israel was being beaten up by its closest friends in Europe -- reflected a deeper dilemma about how much more tension an already strained alliance can bear. The problem is that Obama has already exhausted his margin for quarreling with Israel -- so much so that a White House session with Netanyahu had been planned for today as a make-up meeting. The session was cancelled, replaced by frantic phone conversations between White House and Israeli officials over whether a common response to the latest crisis was possible. Hanging over the administration’s deliberations are the gratuitous spats with Netanyahu that Obama has blundered into. Twice the president chose to launch pointless and unwinable battles to freeze Israeli settlement construction in Jerusalem. These served only to complicate his Middle East diplomacy, while alienating Israel’s supporters in Congress and the Democratic Party. Just last week, Obama chose to side against Israel in the final deliberations of the Non-Proliferation Treaty review conference. In pursuit of one of the president’s most cherished causes, the United States accepted language calling on Israel to join the NPT and supporting a conference in 2013 on a nuclear-free Middle East. Netanyahu’s government was left alone in its opposition. Consequently, the question Israeli officials are asking about the Gaza crisis is “will Israel be alone -- again?” It won’t be easy for Obama to answer. Another public rift between the United States and Israel is the last thing the White House needs as it tries to wrest concessions from Netanyahu in Middle East peace talks -- and as midterm elections approach. But defending Israel in and outside the United Nations will risk a rift with Turkey, not to mention Arab states, at the moment when the administration is hoping to win broad support for a new Security Council resolution on Iran. Obama would be in this bind regardless of what he had done in the last year. But his missteps have made it worse -- and getting out of it will require more diplomatic finesse than his administration had mustered until now. voices.washingtonpost.com By Jackson Diehl \| June 1, 2010; 5:22 AM ET