SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ManyMoose who wrote (367016)6/1/2010 4:57:36 PM
From: semi_infinite 4 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793807
 
No that would increase risks rather than reduce risks. There are plenty of built-in safety margins. High density drilling muds, MWD sensors, customized cements, subsea safety valve, blowout preventer and engineers that are taught not to test the system limits by removing drilling mud before the well is ready. BP failed in the last item and also for failing to test the BOP. Transocean also has a role in the failure to test and repair BOP if the 60 minutes interviewee has his facts straight. Halliburton as far as I can tell did what BP wanted after offering their recommendations. BP not running a cement bond log after the cement job is just mind boggling to me.