SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: coug who wrote (80774)6/3/2010 12:09:02 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
BP and the Bankers

usatrends.info



To: coug who wrote (80774)6/3/2010 12:58:30 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Reckoning in the Gulf
______________________________________________________________

Lead Editorial
The New York Times
June 2, 2010

The criminal and civil investigations announced by the Justice Department this week into the disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico are clearly necessary.

The spill, the worst in United States history and growing more damaging by the day, cries out for accountability and appropriate punishment. Attorney General Eric Holder did not name specific targets, but BP, Transocean — the rig operator — and other important subcontractors like Halliburton are obvious candidates.

Justice’s investigation will run parallel to an inquiry by a special commission appointed by President Obama to discover the causes of the disaster, assess the performance of federal oversight agencies and recommend ways to prevent similar calamities. The White House must take special care that both are allowed to do a complete job. Even though their missions are different — the Justice Department mainly concerned with lawbreaking, the commission with safety — overlap is inevitable.

Both, for instance, will be talking to many of the same witnesses from government and industry. Unlike the Justice Department, the commission does not have subpoena powers. Congress should grant that power if only to make sure that witnesses from an industry that is accustomed to going its own way actually show up.

As Mr. Holder knows, the legal journey will be long and arduous. Exxon did not finally settle up for damages related to the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill — in addition to the billions it paid in cleanup costs — until a Supreme Court decision in 2008. BP is responsible for containing the gulf spill and cleaning it up, but the fines it must ultimately pay, as well as compensatory damages to injured parties, will depend in part on the whether the company can be shown to have broken the law.

One relevant law is the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, enacted after the Exxon Valdez spill, which imposes monetary penalties for every barrel of spilled oil — even if negligence is not found, but more if it is. Another is the Clean Water Act, which carries both civil and criminal penalties for polluting waterways. BP could also be found negligent under the Marine Mammal Protection Act because it failed to obtain necessary federal permits to drill in areas inhabited by endangered whales.

In addition, Mr. Holder said he would investigate potential liability under the Migratory Bird Act Treaty and the Endangered Species Act, which provide penalties for injury and death to wildlife and bird species. Exxon agreed in 1991 to pay $100 million to settle criminal charges under the various statutes, and later paid $1 billion in federal and state civil damages and $500 million in punitive damages.

Senator Barbara Boxer, who was pressing Mr. Holder to act, raised one more ominous possibility: that BP may have made false and misleading statements to federal authorities in the 2009 exploratory drilling plan it submitted to the Minerals Management Service. The plan asserted that the company had “proven equipment and technology” to respond to a blowout. Given the ad hoc nature of BP’s response, Ms. Boxer has suggested, that assertion now seems misleading or even false.

There are extraordinarily tough times ahead for the gulf and the region’s residents. That BP will also suffer does not trouble us in the least.



To: coug who wrote (80774)6/3/2010 2:11:38 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Politics & the BP Oil Disaster: MoveOn.Org breaks it down

bpoil.wordpress.com



To: coug who wrote (80774)6/3/2010 11:46:03 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Why has the Obama Administration allowed BP to use close to a million gallons of the toxic dispersant Corexit...??

Dr. Seth Forman on the Health Risks of Corexit, the BP Oil Disaster Dispersant

youtube.com

_______________________

"The dispersant is a toxic pollutant that has been applied in the volume of millions of gallons and I think has greatly exacerbated the situation. I think the whole idea of using a dispersant is wrong, and I think it’s part of the whole pattern of BP trying to cover up and hide the body. They don’t want us to see how much oil, so they’ve taken this oil that was concentrated at the surface and dissolved it. But when you dissolve it, it’s still there, and it actually gets more toxic, because instead of being in big blobs, it’s now dissolved and can get across the gills, get into the mouths of animals. The water below the floating oil was water. Now it’s this toxic soup. So I think that in this whole pattern of BP trying to not let people know what’s going on, the idea of disperse the oil is a way of just hiding the body. But it actually makes the oil more toxic, and it adds this incredible amount of toxic pollutant in the dispersant itself."

~Carl Safina, president of Blue Ocean Institute and author of many books about marine ecology

________________________________________

IMO, this Corexit dispersant will make it impossible to gather all the oil at the surface. We would be better off with the clumps of oil that skimmers and tankers can deal with. BP is trying to break up the oil so that it will spread out faster undersea making it appear like less of a problem at any single location. They say this is the right thing to do. They are lying through their teeth. STOP it now. BP doesn't have the worst safety record in the petroleum industry by accident...In the last decade BP has had over $730 Million in safety fines...Hmmm....Wake up Obama administration and show that you actually have the leverage to get BP to STOP USING COREXIT in our Gulf of Mexico....the president tells us that the government is in control of everything -- I don't believe that for a minute.



To: coug who wrote (80774)6/4/2010 12:10:26 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
BP Toolpusher Jason Anderson Feared for His Life

seminal.firedoglake.com

By: Watt4Bob Thursday June 3, 2010 8:24 am

Proving that even a blind dog occasionally finds a bone, NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams, last night aired a poignant interview with the wife of Jason Anderson, toolpusher with Transocean, the company in charge of drilling on the Deepwater Horizon which blew-up and sank in the GOM, killing 11 men and initiating what is probably destined to be the biggest environmental disaster in our country’s history.

Jason’s wife Shelly says the last time he was home, he was very concerned to put his affairs in order, he wrote a will and gave her instructions regarding things to do if anything were to ‘happen to him’.

Jason told his father that BP was pushing the rig operators to stray from proper procedures to speed up the drilling, and that he thought this was unsafe.

In Jason’s last telephone calls with his wife Shelly, he told her he could not talk about his concerns because the ‘walls were too thin’ but that he would tell her about it later when he got home.

Jason never got home, he was killed in the Deepwater Horizon explosions, some of the survivors, his fellow workers have since told Shelley that he died trying to save them.

You can view the NBC interview here:

seminal.firedoglake.com



To: coug who wrote (80774)6/4/2010 12:58:28 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Hightower: Who the Hell's in Charge Here? BP Disaster Caused by a Nasty Mix of Government Impotence and Corporate Rule

By Jim Hightower
AlterNet
June 2, 2010

"What we're witnessing is not merely a human and environmental horror, but also an appalling deterioration in our nation's governance."

Many news reports about the Gulf oil catastrophe refer to it as a "spill." Wrong. A spill is a minor "oops" — one accidentally spills milks, for example, and from childhood, we're taught the old aphorism: "Don't cry over spilt milk." What's in the Gulf isn't milk and it wasn't spilt. The explosion of BP's Deepwater Horizon well was the inevitable result of deliberate decisions made by avaricious corporate executives, laissez faire politicians and obsequious regulators.

As the ruinous gulf oil blowout spreads onto land, over wildlife, across the ocean floor and into people's lives, it raises a fundamental question for all of us Americans: Who the hell's in charge here? What we're witnessing is not merely a human and environmental horror, but also an appalling deterioration in our nation's governance. Just as we saw in Wall Street's devastating economic disaster and in Massey Energy's murderous explosion inside its Upper Big Branch coal mine, the nastiness in the gulf is baring an ugly truth that We the People must finally face: We are living under de facto corporate rule that has rendered our government impotent.

Thirty years of laissez-faire, ideological nonsense (pushed upon us with a vengeance in the past decade) has transformed government into a subsidiary of corporate power. Wall Street, Massey, BP and its partners — all were allowed to become their own "regulators" and officially encouraged to put their short-term profit interests over the public interest.

Let's not forget that on April 2, barely two weeks before Deepwater Horizon blew and 11 people perished on the spot, the public's No. 1 official, Barack Obama, trumpeted his support for more deepwater oil drilling, blithely regurgitating Big Oil's big lie: "Oil rigs today generally don't cause spills." He and his advisors had not bothered to check the truth of that — they simply took the industry's word. That's not governing, it's aiding and abetting profiteers, and it's a pathetic performance.

But that was only the start of Washington's oily confession that it has surrendered control to corporate arrogance and avarice.

With an unprecedented volume of crude gushing from the well and the magnitude of the disaster multiplying geometrically by the day, who was in charge of coping with that? Not the White House, not the interior secretary, not the EPA. As we saw when Wall Street's greed exploded our economy, the polluting scoundrels were left in charge!

While BP's dapper CEO issued patently ridiculous statements (such as, "Everything we can see at the moment suggests that the overall environmental impact of this will be very, very modest."), our government blindly went along with BP's false assertion that only some 5,000 barrels a day were pouring from the well, when independent experts were shouting at the White House that the correct volume was up to 19 times that much.

Finally, almost a month after the blowout, Obama ordered a moratorium on drilling new offshore wells and on granting environmental waivers to the oil giants. Bravo, Mr. President! But ... his moratorium was simply ignored. Days after his order, oil companies were handed at least seven more drilling permits and five waivers.

Last week, with 63 percent of the public disapproving of his meek deference to BP, the president of the United States of America was reduced to convening a press conference to insist that he was "engaged" and, behind the scenes, was "monitoring" BP's efforts.

Wow, monitoring! Excuse me, but who's the president here? Obama should personally take charge —-cancel all of his social and political events, convene an emergency response team of the best scientific minds in the world, announce a clear plan of clean-up actions, install all relevant Cabinet officials in a Gulf Coast command center to direct the actions, make daily reports on progress to the public, fire a mess of failed regulators and go to Congress with sweeping legislation to replace America's oil dependency with a crash program of conservation and renewable energy sources.

Oh, he should also wring a few corporate necks. Instead of monitoring these criminals, prosecute them — and put the public back in charge of our government.

*Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the new book, "Swim Against the Current: Even a Dead Fish Can Go With the Flow." (Wiley, March 2008) He publishes the monthly "Hightower Lowdown," co-edited by Phillip Frazer.

alternet.org



To: coug who wrote (80774)6/4/2010 3:58:35 AM
From: stockman_scott1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
VOICES: Federalize BP

southernstudies.org