SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChanceIs who wrote (133569)6/2/2010 12:02:41 PM
From: microhoogle!  Respond to of 206175
 
Where is BP based off? Britain? Wonder if Brits (government) would go down the path of kicking BP leadership and bringing in new blood. Perhaps break the company down into different business units in a way that mitigates British pensions.



To: ChanceIs who wrote (133569)6/2/2010 12:12:04 PM
From: Kayaker6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206175
 
"Having been roasted for criticizing Obama [Clinton, Pelosi] previously I will go ahead..." and use this post to insert more political views and take one more shot at Obama and Pelosi.



To: ChanceIs who wrote (133569)6/2/2010 12:37:02 PM
From: I_C_Deadpeople  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206175
 
If BP has the financial capability to pay the 'fine' and/or cost of the spill, there is no need to panic and bail them out. if the shareholders want to turf management, they can set about doing that. If the fine/cost puts them in a possible bankruptcy situation so be it.

The BP stock price has little relevance to anything going on in the Gulf other than they may have to issue stock to pay for the mess. Again, the shareholders will and should have to take the kick in the ass for that. That is the risk they took.



To: ChanceIs who wrote (133569)6/2/2010 2:19:24 PM
From: Webster Groves  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206175
 
<Sooooooo maybe the US in the next two weeks should present BP a bill for a bi$$ion or two and say that is it. This is the settlement.>

I believe your idea is a good step in stabilizing the issue and removing doubt and uncertainty.
As you suggest, a British billion should cover the "legitimate" claims.

wg