SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TopCat who wrote (569832)6/2/2010 11:29:18 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation  Read Replies (8) | Respond to of 1578718
 
Romanoff confirms White House job discussions

By The Denver Post
Posted: 06/02/2010 06:15:51 PM MDT
Updated: 06/02/2010 06:49:04 PM MDT

U.S. Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff acknowledged tonight that he discussed three possible jobs with the deputy chief of staff of the Obama administration — all contingent upon a decision by Romanoff not to challenge U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet.

Romanoff said none of the jobs was formally offered, but said the only reason they were discussed with Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina was if Romanoff stayed out of the Senate race.

"Mr. Messina also suggested three positions that might be available to me were I not pursuing the Senate race," Romanoff wrote in a statement. "He added that he could not guarantee my appointment to any of these positions. At no time was I promised a job, nor did I request Mr. Messina's assistance

Extras
Read an e-mails from White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina to Andrew Romanoff detailing the three jobs they discussed.
in obtaining one."

The Denver Post reported last Fall that the discussions were held between Romanoff and Messina. Romanoff tonight released an email from Messina, outlining two positions at USAID, and a third as director of the U.S. Trade and Development Agency that could be available to him if he weren't running for Senate.

The White House has maintained that no formal offer was made to Romanoff. A spokesman there could not immediately be reached for comment on Romanoff's statement.



To: TopCat who wrote (569832)6/3/2010 2:38:02 PM
From: jlallen2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578718
 
What a dumb fukk that CJ is, eh?



To: TopCat who wrote (569832)6/3/2010 3:18:56 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578718
 
"How is that moving the goalpost?"

Because what was being discussed was political favors.

The issue could only be "for exchange for that person dropping out of a political race" if Clinton actually said "this is contingent on dropping out". No way that Clinton, or the Obama administration would be dumb enough to do that.