Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffery E. Forrest who wrote (931)	11/6/1997 6:49:00 PM
From: Roebear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4571

Jeffery, I do not think or use the term scuttlebutt in a derogatory sense either. Although it can mean gossip. The word comes from, the news the men on ships talked about around the ship's drinking water barrel, which was called the scuttlebutt. Sort of water cooler shop/office talk. I think that's not too far off the mark and news gets around a ship or company pretty fast and as often as not its accurate, isn't it? So I'm sorry the gentleman took offense but none was intended! And I still think they should go for more money!:-) Roebear

To: Jeffery E. Forrest who wrote (931)	11/6/1997 11:02:00 PM
From: D.McQ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4571

Jeffery...thanks for the the post from the stockhouse...I just want to make one point ..... There is a big difference between hiring a writer to write a newsletter and purchasing the reprint rites.... To claify this I checked with BCMD and Cambridge research was not hired to do their research. Cambridge Research did this detailed research work on their own..... This is an independent research paper written and distributed by Cambridge Research who is not affiliated with BCMD in any way. BCMD merely bought the reprint rites Why wouldn't they buy these reprint rites. Especially when a paper of this caliber groups them in the same paragraph with such elite legends as "Diamond Fields" and "Hemlo Gold, Echo Bay, Corona (which pulsated from 25 cents to $35) and other legends". Cambridge Research then goes on in great detail to document exactly why they do this. This is no fluff piece but a well researched and documented evaluation of BCMD from an impartial third party. Cambridge Research is giving BCMD stock a "BUY" recommendation to subscribers and INVESTORS, WHO DO pay them well to do this extensive research. These 26,000 subscribers use the findings of this company's research to help them make a decision to invest and purchase stock in BCMD and other companies. These subscribers are spending a large sum of money based on this research and Cambridge Research had better do an impartial, and thorough research of a company or these same subscribers will be dropping Cambridge Research in a hurry. You don't buy this kind of research unless it is good. Darlene