Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (80880)	6/4/2010 2:05:36 PM
From: coug	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

True or he just didn't care. So he left it up to his oily buddies.. :(

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (80880)	6/4/2010 2:27:05 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 89467

<<...O was On it from Day One...the cover up that is...>> Any president (and his EPA) that allowed a Big Oil firm like BP to use at least a million gallons of the toxic dispersant Corexit in the Gulf makes me wonder about his judgement...Is the White House only listening to scientists from BP who have the primary focus on hiding the full magnitude of the spill...?? The smartest scientists and toxicologists in the world would never have signed off on using Corexit in the Gulf -- it's making the oil spill worse and helping to create the large undersea oil plumes too. Britain didn't totally ban Corexit 10 years ago by accident. READ THIS PRESIDENT OBAMA AND ASK YOURSELF WHO IS RUNNING THE SHOW DOWN IN THE GULF...?? Gulf Oil Spill: BP's Trigger-Happy Use of Dispersants May Contaminate Seafood for Years industry.bnet.com