Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (252101)	6/5/2010 1:01:50 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 306849

The interesting problem for BP if the leak is significantly > than 15KBPD is that it will make it look like they designed a solution based on believing their own BS about the original magnitude of the leak. BP has been accused all along of understating the size of the leak, largely for liability reasons. But one would assume they internally were more candid. If they are way off, they will once again look like major fools. On the bright side, if the flow is significantly above 15KBPD, and there are no easy solutions to boost the flow with this equipment, than there is zero reason to worry about the seal!

To: neolib who wrote (252101)	6/5/2010 2:34:28 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

I've read a lot of post by people curious what the correct entry point to buy BP should be. A lot of people think the rumors of the death of BP are mistaken, and that it has the revenues to pay for all the damage and survive. It just needs a name change. What is Phillip Morris called today?