Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (29122)	6/8/2010 12:00:16 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

<<<I listened to much of that and didn't think he was at all convincing>>> On the one hand you have a scientist going on for 85 minutes or so about a skeptics specious arguments. On the other hand you have a skeptic without any formal training in science, never written a peer reviewed, science based, paper and fabricating evidence and misrepresenting his sources. It is not unlike researching some medical issue. Instead of listening to people who have had training and experience in medicine and instead wasting time listening to some quack with an english accent making up stories. I am basically not up to debunking quacks.