Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Heinz Blasnik- Views You Can Use -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alanrs who wrote (4611)	6/9/2010 10:23:25 AM
From: Eva	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4904

Heinz is busy lately, here is more: acting-man.com acting-man.com

To: alanrs who wrote (4611)	6/9/2010 6:06:36 PM
From: LLCF	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4904

FWIW I'm not big on Laffer or the idea that "economic growth" is the end all. If all the polluters and zillions of people move into a "no tax" area.... so? Then those with money made from free and wild development that resulted in crappy schools, sprawling ugly developments, traffic jams as far as the eye can see, just leave and fire everyone when they're done and move where it's (still?) beautiful EVEN IF there are high taxes. Maximizing "Economic growth" according to Laffer (ie. lowest costs) includes pollution, clearcutting, shoddy development, crappy schools, and "gasp" Gulf oil spills. <NG> It's a complex issue IMHO. DAK