SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (43688)6/12/2010 1:18:46 AM
From: RMF  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 71588
 
Well, Reagan inherited a rather bad economy.

What he did was "make it worse". He let Volcker turn a bad economy into a horrendous economy. All the while he was blaming it on Carter. I believe Reagan's approvals got down to the mid 30's around 1982.

This time it CERTAINLY wouldn't have been as easy as it was back then, but there were ways to play this that could have protected the economic infrastructure without letting everything go down the tubes and STILL make it look like you were doing things that people wanted but they'd HAVE to suffer a great deal while you were cleaning up the messes of the previous administration.

It would have taken a heck of a politician to pull it off but it's "possible" it could have worked.

Obama was NEVER up to the job.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (43688)6/12/2010 1:24:41 AM
From: RMF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
Buddy, Obama is dead meat in 2012 unless the Republicans nominate some real "goofball" and even then the goofball would have better than even money.

The Republican nominee for the Senate in Nevada is a very strange Lady and in normal times she couldn't get elected dog catcher, but unless they can really find something incredible on her she's got a real shot at beating Harry Reid.