Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (29133)	6/8/2010 2:11:12 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Monckton scored points against Abraham and showed how he was relying on dishonest accusations against Monckton's presentation. Dishonesty isn't a problem for climate alarmists.

To: Land Shark who wrote (29133)	6/8/2010 3:37:56 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

Kant, look back upstream this SI discussion. The people on the Climate Alarmist mantra use arguments like this: <Monckton is a liar and a scam artist. You're an idiot for following his drivel. Monckton has 0 credibility. > Wharfie does sometimes provide links to official rhetoric which is interesting, but his own contributions are along the lines of "Your feet stink, you are an idiot, a loser and pestilent and your mother was a ..." Those of us taking an interest to see whether there might be a problem eventually have to ignore your hysteria and look for what might be true but with the dishonesty, data manipulation, tendentious "science" and self-dealing hypocrites, it's hard to find the good stuff. "Hiding the data" is what the official top-notch climate scientists get up to. Destroying the data if they might be forced to disclose it. Which is what happened. Those are not scientists. Politicians have little idea about science so they take at face value the lies as does the ignorant public because it sounds sort of scientific and those graphs are certainly more than the public could understand at high school when they failed science. But they like to think of themselves as good people who want a good environment and the like animals and stuff too. So they are suckers for the con artists. Mqurice