SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Amati investors -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MangoBoy who wrote (28435)11/6/1997 8:29:00 PM
From: SteveG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31386
 
<..outside plant" means the copper hanging from the telephone poles. this is happening in seattle. there are neighborhoods where the limiting factor is the availability of a copper pair.>

Since CDSL works just like ADSL (insofar as allowing digital over copper independant from, but simutaneous with, analog voice), why would having a limited # of lines (vs a limited number of switch slots) then be any different comparing the two?

<the majority of second-lines are for modems; certainly the ones that
are tying up circuits for extended periods. ADSL allows the telco to
deliver better internet plus standard voice over a single line with
higher overall revenue. the second line is freed up for new residences
or other second-line use.>

So too with CDSL. It offers the same benefits (at likely an inappreciably lower bandwidth), without the cost of a truck roll or (optionally) a DSLAM purchase and maintenance, as well offering a fallback to standard 56K QAM. So I still don't see your earlier point: (from exchange2000.com )

<...they'll only make matters worse by facilitating people to tie up circuits for extended periods..>

CDSL DOESN'T tie up a voice line. Just like ADSL, it plans to offer net-tone leaving the analog voiceline free. As I've said, I am unclear on the details of HOW it plans to offer direct switch tie-in. It may well plug into the voice line card (where switch space is limited), leaving the ratios intact (while freeing second datalines).

I suspect until we know more of the details, further speculation as to whether it is a competitive and/or viable solution or not is purely hypothetical. But I DO think we have the good questions now, and a better general understanding.

Steve



To: MangoBoy who wrote (28435)11/7/1997 12:55:00 AM
From: pat mudge  Respond to of 31386
 
[US West]

uswest.com

Think what will happen when GTE rolls out 2.2 to 6Mbps speeds.

Pat