SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (571207)6/11/2010 11:32:36 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583412
 
probably from Jefferson's freezer

Clyburne sees racism every where, even in a turkey sandwich.

I saw Greene also, what a dumb fukk, definitely a democrat. He's as smart as 3/4 of the black caucus. I wonder if he thinks islands can capsize.



To: bentway who wrote (571207)6/11/2010 11:45:53 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1583412
 
ABC Reporter Uses BP Workers as Backdrop; Network Claims Press was ‘Hassled’

How to become part of the story: 1: Set up your camera so BP clean-up workers are your backdrop. 2: Act condescending and arrogant when a BP representative asks what you're doing. 3: Accuse BP of paranoia. Finishing touch: ABC posts the video with the headline "Press Hassled on Gulf Coast?"

breitbart.tv



To: bentway who wrote (571207)6/11/2010 12:15:32 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583412
 
Were the people who voted for him plants?



To: bentway who wrote (571207)6/12/2010 4:49:32 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583412
 
My congressmen will hear from me this weekend re. this subject.

COMING TO TERMS WITH A 'DEBILITATING ENERGY STALEMATE'....

With oil continuing to gush into the Gulf of Mexico, the need for the United States to reevaluate its approach to energy policy has become especially acute of late. As we saw this week on the vote on a scheme to strip the EPA of its power to regulate carbon emissions, every single Republican in the Senate, and a few too many center-right Democrats, want no such reevaluation.

The status quo may not work, but an improved national energy framework carries costs and requires some sacrifices -- and cowardly conservative policymakers would rather stick with failure.

But at nearly the identical time the Senate debate was getting underway on Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski's (R) scheme, the Innovation Council, featuring some high-profile participants, offered a very compelling blueprint for sustainable energy strategy. Ron Brownstein explained that the group "issued a mayday manifesto urging a massive public-private effort to accelerate research into clean-energy innovations."

Without such a commitment, they warned, the United States will remain vulnerable to energy price shocks; continue to "enrich hostile regimes" that supply much of the United States' oil; and cede to other nations dominance of "vast new markets for clean-energy technologies." [...]


The council frames the need for a new energy direction as being as much of an economic imperative as an environmental one. It calls for a national energy strategy centered on a $16 billion annual federal investment in energy research -- as much, the group pointedly notes, as the United States spends on imported oil every 16 days.

Equally important, the group urges that government catalyze the development of energy alternatives by sending "a strong market signal" through such mechanisms as mandates on utilities to produce more renewable energy or "a price or a cap" on carbon emissions. Such a cap is precisely what the Senate resolution sought to block. But the business leaders said that it is one of the policies that could "create a large, sustained market for new energy technology."

One of the council's key insights was to recognize that expanded energy research and limits on carbon (or other mandates to promote renewable power) are not alternative but complementary policies: One increases the supply of new energy sources; the other increases demand for them.

It's tempting to think that conservative policymakers, if nothing else, would care about American competitiveness on the global stage -- a concept that has no ideological bias. Republicans should take note, then, that as the rest of the world invests heavily in clean-energy technology -- and we don't -- our trade deficit worsens, and jobs and industries that could grow here, have no choice but to go elsewhere.

The United States, Brownstein concluded, is "paying for the debilitating energy stalemate" on Capitol Hill. The price is high, and the consequences are severe.

If the stalemate is going to be broken, and the country is going to pursue a more responsible approach, policymakers are going to have to hear from the public on this. At this point, head-in-the-sand Republicans and anxiety-ridden Democrats would prefer to do nothing -- ignoring global warming, maintaining our oil dependence; undermining American competitiveness, ignoring job creation, failing to reduce our budget deficit -- because they think that's what the public wants.

If Americans disagree, we'll have to let them know.



To: bentway who wrote (571207)6/15/2010 9:09:07 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Respond to of 1583412
 
His name is AL GREENE .... just like Al Green, but with an E on the end. No big mystery why blacks voted for him.

You know who Al Green is, right, bwana .... or el jefe?



To: bentway who wrote (571207)6/15/2010 9:33:53 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1583412
 
Maybe a light will go on in YOUR head....

Al Greene - Al Green...

youtube.com

algreenmusic.com



To: bentway who wrote (571207)6/15/2010 9:51:17 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1583412
 
CNN Determined to Mock Dem Candidate Greene

breitbart.tv

I like this comment, so true.

What’s the problem? This poor guy just saw another guy do the same type of work and become President.
The only difference is one is better at public speaking than the other. They both have the same grasp on policy and facts.



To: bentway who wrote (571207)6/15/2010 10:15:05 AM
From: Jim McMannis1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583412
 
Bent...get ready.

Reverend Al Green

youtube.com