Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (43748)	6/11/2010 3:16:23 PM
From: TimF	2 Recommendations Respond to of 71588

Ax May Fall on Mortgage Interest Deduction The Hill, Ax May Fall on Tax Break for Mortgages: The popular tax break for mortgage interest, once considered untouchable, is falling under the scrutiny of policymakers and economic experts seeking ways to close huge deficits. Although Congress last year rejected the White House’s proposed cut to the amount wealthier taxpayers can deduct for home mortgage interest payments, the administration included it again in its 2010 budget — saying it could save $208 billion over the next decade. And now that sentiment has turned against all the federal red ink — and cost-cutting is in vogue — Democrats on President Barack Obama’s financial commission are considering the wisdom of permanent tax breaks such as the mortgage deduction and corporate deferral. Calling them “tax entitlements,” senior Democratic lawmakers have argued they should be on the table for reform just like traditional entitlement programs Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid. ... Although the backers of the mortgage interest tax break defend it as a key incentive for people to own rather than rent their homes, some say that’s not so. A Brookings-Urban Tax Policy Center study found that the mortgage interest tax break costs more than $100 billion annually but does little to encourage the middle class and less wealthy to buy homes. “I’m not sure that we need to subsidize homeownership at all through the tax system,” said Eric Toder, the study’s lead author. taxprof.typepad.com

To: TimF who wrote (43748)	6/11/2010 7:57:04 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 71588

I do not believe that the tax deduction for interest on single home mortgages will EVER be done away with in America. It is sacrosanct, it is 'apple pie'. (But capping the deduction at some high mark... or otherwise restricting it as the tax writers have previously done for second and third homes, 'vacation' properties, or even commercial investments, remain possibilities. I can see little rational benefit in subsidizing through the tax codes the purchase or construction of a Neverland Ranch for example....) However, my point was a larger one that did not concern itself solely with real estate... but rather with the deduction for interest expenses on DEBT itself. Like I said: why should ONE FORM of capital raising - going into debt - be FAVORED by the tax codes over ALL OTHER FORMS of capital raising (such as savings... equity issuance, etc.) PARTICULARLY in a nation that has problems with indebtedness... why in the world would we want to ENCOURAGE and INCENTIVIZE the accumulation of more debt instead of encouraging THRIFT and SAVINGS and ENTREPRENEURSHIP?