Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (85783)	6/13/2010 2:03:48 AM
From: ahhaha	3 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 224749

Just warming cycles with each cycle warmer than the last one. 2005 warmer than 1998 and 2010 warmer than 2005. What is the source of this claim?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (85783)	6/13/2010 12:58:34 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224749

Besides the fact that the temperature data that has been presented to us is highly suspect, it is absurd to think that transient temperature fluctuations on a scale of 10 years, 20 years or even 150 years is in any way meaningful on a geologic scale. Further, even if your assertion is correct it gets a big ole "so what?". Warming is good for nearly all terrestrial life forms...especially humans. And to top that off, the evidence that humans had anything to do with the warming is tenuous at best. If the earth is warming, there's not much we can do about it other than enjoy it. You had better pray it is warming. Because the real scientific evidence is that we are in for a serious cooling period that will kill millions of people. When you can come back and talk intelligently about the glacial/inter-glacial cycles and what causes them, then maybe you'll find someone who will listen to you. Welcome to the end of the inter-glacial period. brrrrrrr