Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (571719)	6/15/2010 5:41:54 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1577965

"I see no reason to give beliefs in the ‘origin’ of species, based on Darwinian theory more weight as a science than other beliefs in origins. " More blather by _less. It is pretty clear your knowledge of Darwin's work is superficial. At best.

To: one_less who wrote (571719)	6/15/2010 8:21:41 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577965

>>Darwanism is a belief system. Evolution as described by Darwin is not. Evolution accounts for the adaptation and change in species; it is both observable and replicable. It does much to explain the survival of certain life forms while others move on to extinction. I see no reason to give beliefs in the ‘origin’ of species, based on Darwinian theory more weight as a science than other beliefs in origins.>> I'll giv you a reason. We can duplicate it in the "LAB"! You cannot duplicate other theories of origine in the lab. >>None can be verified according to scientific methods of observation. Evolution science is not the opposite of beliefs, it is in a completely separate zone of knowing that falls within the scientific sphere. Arguing for or against any belief system has little to do with scientific endeavor, but not nothing to do with scientific endeavor.>> Evolutionary science is not the opposite of beliefs, it is the opposite of "faith".