SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (81414)6/16/2010 4:24:09 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
BP’s ‘Nightmare’ Well: Internal Documents Uncover Negligence

wired.com



To: koan who wrote (81414)6/16/2010 4:40:34 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
BP Oil Spill Lawsuits Spread to States Beyond Gulf Coast

By Laurel Brubaker Calkins and Margaret Cronin Fisk

June 16 (Bloomberg) -- BP Plc faces more than 225 lawsuits in 11 states as litigation from businesses, individuals and investors continues to increase almost two months after the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded.

In addition to scores of claims brought in five states along the Gulf shore, coastal businesses and property owners in Georgia and South Carolina have sued for damages from the drifting oil, which has yet to round the southern tip of Florida and enter the Atlantic Ocean.

Investors in three states, including Louisiana and Alaska, have sued BP’s board of directors for allegedly causing more than $50 billion in shareholder losses by failing to implement safety policies that would have prevented the spill. In a separate class-action lawsuit in Florida, the company is accused of “a pattern” of criminal acts including fraud. That suit seeks triple damages under federal civil racketeering law.

“The damage is not just suffered at ground zero along the Gulf Coast,” said Mark Lanier, a Houston lawyer representing dozens of fishermen and property owners against BP. “The shock waves reverberate across state lines and across occupational lines.”

A judge may decide there isn’t a strong enough connection between some damage claims and the spill itself and those claims will be thrown out, Lanier said yesterday in a phone interview. “But we’re not at that point yet,” he said.

Primary Liability

BP, as owner of the underwater lease, has primary liability for damages caused by the tens of millions of gallons of crude oil that have spewed from the damaged well since the April explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon. Almost all the lawsuits also name Transocean Ltd., which owned the rig, along with Cameron International Corp. and Halliburton Energy Services Inc., which provided the rig’s blowout prevention equipment and cementing services, respectively.

David Nicholas, a BP spokesman, didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment yesterday.

BP America Inc. Chairman Lamar McKay told Congress in May that the company will pay all “legitimate” claims related to the spill. On June 2, Credit Suisse estimated the combined cleanup, restoration and litigation costs of the spill could top $37 billion.

President Barack Obama said yesterday in a televised speech that he will tell BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg in a White House meeting today that the London-based company must set aside “whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness.”

Securities Lawsuits

Three lawsuits claiming securities fraud were filed by BP investors in federal courts in Louisiana. The lawsuits, each seeking to represent buyers of BP American depositary receipts in a class action, claim the company and its officials inflated share values by issuing “materially false and misleading statements” about BP’s safety record and protocols.

“BP’s procedures for minimizing its financial losses from drilling rig problems were no more than fantasies,” said lawyers for the Johnson Investment Counsel in a June 7 filing in Lafayette, Louisiana. “BP was simply not the enterprise that its public communications pictured.”

The lawsuit claims BP’s actions cost investors more than $56 billion in share value by May 25. The plaintiff is an investment holding company, said its attorney Stanley M. Chesley at Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley in Cincinnati.

Directors Targeted

At least five so-called derivative lawsuits brought by shareholders on behalf of BP were filed against current and former officers and directors of the company. These lawsuits, filed in state and federal courts in Alaska, Delaware and Louisiana, contend that company mismanagement led to the April 20 explosion.

The spill “is a catastrophe of epic proportions brought by the greed and fraudulent conduct of BP,” according to a civil racketeering lawsuit filed June 12 in Florida that names as defendants the company, various corporate entities, and Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward.

The lawsuit alleges that BP “successfully infiltrated” the Minerals Management Service, the federal regulatory agency overseeing off-shore drilling, and “systematically submitted unsubstantiated and erroneous exploration and oil spill response plans and lease agreements.”

Although oil has yet to leave the Gulf of Mexico, three proposed class-action lawsuits were filed last week in federal court in Charleston, South Carolina, on behalf of property owners, tourism-related businesses, real estate companies and other businesses in six coastal counties. Lawyers involved in those cases say fears the slick will foul beaches later this summer already have caused tourists to cancel trips and vacation rentals.

‘Already Hurting Us’

“The actual spill may not have reached our shores but the effects have,” attorney Aaron Jophlin of the Bell Legal Group LLC in Georgetown, South Carolina, said in an interview. “We hear the effects from our friends and neighbors that, man, it’s already hurting us.”

Owners of condominiums and hotels in Alabama and the Florida Panhandle, where oil is now washing ashore on beaches regularly listed among those with the world’s whitest sand, have filed dozens of lawsuits over lost business. Charter boat operators, fishing guides, marinas, souvenir vendors and watercraft-rental shops as far south as the Florida Keys are suing.

Some of New Orleans’s largest convention hotels, including the Marriott Convention Center and Wyndham Riverfront, have sued over bookings they claim they will lose now and into the future. Meeting planners, who work years in advance, may avoid booking conventions in coastal resorts just as they did after Hurricane Katrina devastated much of the central Gulf Coast in 2005, lawyers for the hotels say.

Katrina Effect

While most New Orleans hotels and restaurants reopened fairly quickly after Katrina, “We still had a tail of lost business for a couple of years” as meeting planners avoided the region, said Steve Herman, a lawyer for the hotels.

Restaurant owners throughout the Gulf Coast are suing over higher seafood prices and the reduced supply of fresh shrimp, oysters and fish, as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has closed 32 percent of the Gulf to commercial fishing. About 75 percent of shrimp and 20 percent of all seafood consumed in the U.S. comes from the Gulf, according to papers filed in multiple lawsuits.

Restaurateurs also are suing over lost income, claiming customers are avoiding seafood altogether over fears of contamination.

Fishing Fleet

Whole fleets of fishing industry workers have arrived at Gulf courthouses, including 11,700 individually named Vietnamese-American commercial fishermen who filed six lawsuits against BP and Transocean in federal court in Houston.

Thirty-three Mexican citizens who own or work on fishing boats or in seafood processing plants along the U.S. Gulf coast have sued BP and Transocean over lost income from the closure of Gulf waters.

Residents in Kentucky and Tennessee, who own Gulf beachfront properties, have sued over lost income from rental cancellations as well as the lost enjoyment of their own vacation homes.

“BP has grievously injured the entire country, not simply a city, parish, county or state,” Houston attorney Michael Holley, who represents multiple spill victims, said yesterday in an interview. “Hundreds of thousands -- soon to be millions -- of Americans are seeking redress anywhere it can be obtained, and the litigation will continue to spread as the oil and the harm continues to flow.”

BP shares have dropped 48 percent since the spill. They fell 3.8 percent to 342 pence in London trading yesterday, the lowest price since April 1997.

To contact the reporters on this story: Laurel Brubaker Calkins in Houston at laurel@calkins.us.com; Margaret Cronin Fisk in Southfield, Michigan, at mcfisk@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: June 16, 2010 00:01 EDT



To: koan who wrote (81414)6/16/2010 4:52:30 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Can The One Drop the Buzzer-Beating No. 23 Act?
_______________________________________________________________

By MAUREEN DOWD
Op-Ed Columnist
The New York Times
June 15, 2010

Of the many exciting things about Barack Obama’s election, one was the anticipation of a bracing dose of normality in the White House.

America had been trapped for eight years with the Clintons’ marital dysfunction disastrously shaping national events and then trapped for another eight with the Bushes’ Oedipal dysfunction disastrously shaping international events. And before that, L.B.J. and Nixon had acted pretty nutty at times.

President Obama was supposed to be a soothing change. He had a rough childhood. Michelle once told a friend that “Barack spent so much time by himself that it was like he was raised by wolves.” But he seemed to have come through exceptionally well adjusted. “His aides from the Senate, the presidential campaign, and the White House routinely described him with the same words: ‘psychologically healthy,’ ” writes Jonathan Alter in “The Promise,” a chronicle of Obama’s first year in office.

So it’s unnerving now to have yet another president elevating personal quirks into a management style.

How can a man who was a dazzling enough politician to become the first black president at age 47 suddenly become so obdurately self-destructive about politics?

President Obama’s bloodless quality about people and events, the emotional detachment that his aides said allowed him to see things more clearly, has instead obscured his vision. It has made him unable to understand things quickly on a visceral level and put him on the defensive in this spring of our discontent, failing to understand that Americans are upset that a series of greedy corporations have screwed over the little guy without enough fierce and immediate pushback from the president.

“Even though I’m president of the United States, my power is not limitless,” Obama, who has forced himself to ingest a load of gulf crab cakes, shrimp and crawfish tails, whinged to Grand Isle, La., residents on Friday. “So I can’t dive down there and plug the hole. I can’t suck it up with a straw.”

Once more on Tuesday night, we were back to back-against-the-wall time. The president went for his fourth-quarter, Michael Jordan, down-to-the-wire, thrill shot in the Oval Office, his first such dramatic address to a nation sick about the slick.

You know the president is drowning — in oil this time — when he uses the Oval Office. And do words really matter when the picture of oil gushing out of the well continues to fill the screen?

As Obama prepared to go on air, a government panel of scientists again boosted its estimate of how much oil is belching into the besmirched gulf, raising it from 2.1 million gallons a day to roughly 2.5 million.

The president acknowledged that the problems at the Minerals Management Service were deeper than he had known and “the pace of reform was just too slow.” He admitted that “there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done.”

He appointed a “son of the gulf” spill czar and a new guard dog at M.M.S. and tried to restore a sense of confident leadership — “The one approach I will not accept is inaction” — and compassion, reporting on the shrimpers and fishermen and their “wrenching anxiety that their way of life may be lost.” He acted as if he was the boss of BP on the issue of compensation. And he called on us to pray.

Testifying before Congress on Tuesday, Rex Tillerson, the chief of Exxon Mobil, conceded that the emphasis is on prevention because when “these things” happen, “we’re not very well equipped to deal with them.”

Robert Gibbs on Tuesday continued the White House effort to emote, saying on TV: “It makes your blood boil.” But he misses the point. Nobody needs to see the president yelling or pounding the table. Ronald Reagan could convey command with a smile; Clint Eastwood, with a whisper. Americans need to know the president cares so they can be sure he’s taking fast, muscular and proficient action.

W. and Dick Cheney were too headlong, jumping off crazy cliffs and dragging the country — and the world — with them. President Obama is the opposite, often too hesitant to take the obvious action. He seems unable to muster the adrenalin necessary to go full bore until the crowd has waited and wailed and almost given up on him, but it’s a nerve-racking way to campaign and govern.

“On the one hand, you have BP, which sees a risky hole in the ground a couple miles under the sea surface and thinks if we take more risk, and cut some corners, we make millions more. In taking on more risk, they’re gambling with more than money,” said Richard Wolffe, an Obama biographer. “On the other hand, you have Obama, who is ambivalent about risk. What he does late is to embrace risk, like running for president, trebling troops in Afghanistan and health care. But in deferring the risk, he’s gambling with his authority and political capital.”

By trying too hard to keep control, he ends up losing control.



To: koan who wrote (81414)6/16/2010 10:59:52 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
FACT CHECK: Obama left blanks in oil spill speech

By CALVIN WOODWARD
Associated Press Writer
06/16/10

WASHINGTON – In assuring Americans that BP won't control the compensation fund for Gulf oil spill recovery, President Barack Obama failed to mention that the government won't control it, either.

That means it's anyone's guess whether the government can, in fact, make BP pay all costs related to the spill.

Obama aimed high in his prime-time Oval Office address Tuesday night — perhaps higher than the facts support and history teaches — as he vowed to restore livelihoods and nature from the still-unfolding calamity in the Gulf of Mexico.

A look at some of his statements and how they compare with those facts:

OBAMA: "We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused and we will do whatever's necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy. ... Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company's recklessness. And this fund will not be controlled by BP. In order to ensure that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account must and will be administered by an independent, third party."

THE FACTS: An independent arbiter is no more bound to the government's wishes than an oil company's. In that sense, there is no certainty BP will be forced to make the Gulf economy whole again or that taxpayers are off the hook for the myriad costs associated with the spill or cleanup. The government can certainly press for that, using legislative and legal tools. But there are no guarantees and the past is not reassuring.

It took 20 years to sort through liability after the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska, and in the end, punitive damages were slashed by the courts to about $500 million from $2.5 billion. Many people who had lost their livelihoods in the spill died without ever seeing a check.

___

OBAMA: "In the coming days and weeks, these efforts should capture up to 90 percent of the oil leaking out of the well."

THE FACTS: BP and the administration contend that if all goes as planned, they should be able to contain nearly 90 percent of the worst-case oil flow. But that's a big "if." So far, little has gone as planned in the various remedies attempted to shut off or contain the flow. Possibly as much as 60,000 barrels a day is escaping. BP would need to nearly triple its recovery rate to reach the target.

___

OBAMA: Temporary measures will capture leaking oil "until the company finishes drilling a relief well later in the summer that is expected to stop the leak completely."

THE FACTS: That's the hope, but experts say the relief well runs the same risks that caused the original well to blow out. It potentially could create a worse spill if engineers were to accidentally damage the existing well or tear a hole in the undersea oil reservoir.

___

OBAMA: "From the very beginning of this crisis, the federal government has been in charge of the largest environmental cleanup effort in our nation's history."

THE FACTS: Early on, the government established a command center and put Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen in charge of coordinating the overall spill response. But officials also repeatedly have emphasized that BP was "responsible" and they have relied heavily on BP in making decisions from hiring cleanup workers to what oil dispersing chemicals to use. Local officials in the Gulf region have complained that often they don't know who's in charge — the government or BP.

___

OBAMA: "We have approved the construction of new barrier islands in Louisiana to try and stop the oil before it reaches the shore."

THE FACTS: Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and local officials pleaded for weeks with the Army Corps of Engineers and the spill response command for permission to build about 40 miles of sand berms along the barrier islands.

State officials applied for an emergency permit to build the berms May 11, but as days went by Jindal became increasingly angry at federal inaction. The White House finally agreed to a portion of the berm plan on June 2. BP then agreed to pay for the project.

The corps was worried that in some cases such a move would alter tides and drive oil into new areas and produce more harm than good.

___

OBAMA: "Already, I have issued a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling. I know this creates difficulty for the people who work on these rigs, but for the sake of their safety and for the sake of the entire region, we need to know the facts before we allow deepwater drilling to continue."

THE FACTS: Obama issued a six-month moratorium on new permits for deepwater drilling but production continues from existing deepwater wells.

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Daly, H. Josef Hebert and Jim Drinkard in Washington, Brian Schwaner in New Orleans and Carol Druga in Atlanta contributed to this report.