Maybe you need to read this article!
Can The One Drop the Buzzer-Beating No. 23 Act?
By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: June 15, 2010
Of the many exciting things about Barack Obama’s election, one was the
anticipation of a bracing dose of normality in the White House.
America had been trapped for eight years with the Clintons’ marital dysfunction
disastrously shaping national events and then trapped for another eight with the
Bushes’ Oedipal dysfunction disastrously shaping international events. And before
that, L.B.J. and Nixon had acted pretty nutty at times.
President Obama was supposed to be a soothing change. He had a rough childhood.
Michelle once told a friend that “Barack spent so much time by himself that it was
like he was raised by wolves.” But he seemed to have come through exceptionally
well adjusted. “His aides from the Senate, the presidential campaign, and the White
House routinely described him with the same words: ‘psychologically healthy,’ ”
writes Jonathan Alter in “The Promise,” a chronicle of Obama’s first year in
office.
So it’s unnerving now to have yet another president elevating personal quirks into
a management style.
How can a man who was a dazzling enough politician to become the first black
president at age 47 suddenly become so obdurately self-destructive about politics?
President Obama’s bloodless quality about people and events, the emotional
detachment that his aides said allowed him to see things more clearly, has instead
obscured his vision. It has made him unable to understand things quickly on a
visceral level and put him on the defensive in this spring of our discontent,
failing to understand that Americans are upset that a series of greedy corporations
have screwed over the little guy without enough fierce and immediate pushback from
the president.
“Even though I’m president of the United States, my power is not limitless,” Obama,
who has forced himself to ingest a load of gulf crab cakes, shrimp and crawfish
tails, whinged to Grand Isle, La., residents on Friday. “So I can’t dive down there
and plug the hole. I can’t suck it up with a straw.”
Once more on Tuesday night, we were back to back-against-the-wall time. The
president went for his fourth-quarter, Michael Jordan, down-to-the-wire, thrill
shot in the Oval Office, his first such dramatic address to a nation sick about the
slick.
You know the president is drowning — in oil this time — when he uses the Oval
Office. And do words really matter when the picture of oil gushing out of the well
continues to fill the screen?
As Obama prepared to go on air, a government panel of scientists again boosted its
estimate of how much oil is belching into the besmirched gulf, raising it from 2.1
million gallons a day to roughly 2.5 million.
The president acknowledged that the problems at the Minerals Management Service
were deeper than he had known and “the pace of reform was just too slow.” He
admitted that “there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done.”
He appointed a “son of the gulf” spill czar and a new guard dog at M.M.S. and tried
to restore a sense of confident leadership — “The one approach I will not accept is
inaction” — and compassion, reporting on the shrimpers and fishermen and their
“wrenching anxiety that their way of life may be lost.” He acted as if he was the
boss of BP on the issue of compensation. And he called on us to pray.
Testifying before Congress on Tuesday, Rex Tillerson, the chief of Exxon Mobil,
conceded that the emphasis is on prevention because when “these things” happen,
“we’re not very well equipped to deal with them.”
Robert Gibbs on Tuesday continued the White House effort to emote, saying on TV:
“It makes your blood boil.” But he misses the point. Nobody needs to see the
president yelling or pounding the table. Ronald Reagan could convey command with a
smile; Clint Eastwood, with a whisper. Americans need to know the president cares
so they can be sure he’s taking fast, muscular and proficient action.
W. and Dick Cheney were too headlong, jumping off crazy cliffs and dragging the
country — and the world — with them. President Obama is the opposite, often too
hesitant to take the obvious action. He seems unable to muster the adrenalin
necessary to go full bore until the crowd has waited and wailed and almost given up
on him, but it’s a nerve-racking way to campaign and govern.
“On the one hand, you have BP, which sees a risky hole in the ground a couple miles
under the sea surface and thinks if we take more risk, and cut some corners, we
make millions more. In taking on more risk, they’re gambling with more than money,”
said Richard Wolffe, an Obama biographer. “On the other hand, you have Obama, who
is ambivalent about risk. What he does late is to embrace risk, like running for
president, trebling troops in Afghanistan and health care. But in deferring the
risk, he’s gambling with his authority and political capital.”
By trying too hard to keep control, he ends up losing control.
By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: June 15, 2010 |
