SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86017)6/16/2010 1:12:25 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224904
 
Sure, whatever Kenneth.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86017)6/16/2010 1:15:28 PM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224904
 
Americans Not Inclined To Pay More To Fight Global Warming
Wednesday, June 16, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement

Democratic Senators John Kerry and Joe Lieberman declared yesterday
that a new EPA study shows their new global warming legislation won't
cost Americans much after all. But so far most Americans don't show an
inclination to pay anything for such legislation.

"There'll be some people who will want to demagogue that politically,
but that's less than $1 a day," The Politico quoted Lieberman saying at
a press conference yesterday. "Is the American household willing to pay less than $1 so we don't have to buy oil from foreign countries, so we can create millions of new jobs, so we can clean up our environment? I think the answer is going to be yes."

Our surveying suggests, however, that the answer is no.

Fifty-six percent (56%) of Americans say they are not willing to pay
more in taxes and utility costs to generate cleaner energy and fight
global warming, according to a Rasmussen Reports national telephone
survey last August.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

Twenty-two percent (22%) of adults are willing to pay $100 more a year.
Just 10% are willing to pay more than that.

That can't be reassuring to Kerry and Liberman who, according to The
Politico, "found many reasons to gloat after getting the 74-page study
that showed the overall costs from their legislation's major global
warming provisions would cost an average household between $80 to $150 per year."

Since the August 2009 survey, Americans have become a bit less
concerned about global warming, too. Interestingly, President Obama didn't pick up on the supposed low cost of the Kerry-Lieberman legislation and promote it during his Oval Office address on energy policy last night



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86017)6/16/2010 1:16:14 PM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224904
 
Election 2010: Iowa Governor
Iowa Governor: Branstad (R) 57%, Culver (D) 31%
Wednesday, June 16, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement

Republican Terry Branstad appears well on his way at this point to an unprecedented fifth term as governor of Iowa.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Iowa shows Branstad earning 57% support, while his Democratic opponent, current Governor Chet Culver, gets 31% of the vote. Six percent (6%) prefer some other candidate in the race, and six percent (6%) more remain undecided.

This is Branstad’s best showing and Culver’s worst in surveys going back to last September. In late April, Branstad posted a 53% to 38% lead over Culver.

In the previous surveys, the Republican’s support has fallen in the narrow range of 52% to 54%. Culver has earned 34% to 38% of the vote in that same period.

Branstad, who served as governor from 1983 to 1999, won a three-way GOP Primary contest last week with 50% of the vote. Culver, first elected governor in 2006 with 54% of the vote, was unchallenged in his own party.

It is not unusual for the winner of a contested primary to receive a bounce in the polls following their victory.

Forty-one percent (41%) now approve of the job Culver is doing as governor, while 58% disapprove. This is in line with findings in the previous surveys.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 500 Likely Voters in Iowa was conducted on June 14, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Fifty-three percent (53%) of Iowa voters favor repeal of the national health care plan, but 43% oppose repeal. This includes 38% who Strongly Favor repeal and 31% who Strongly Oppose it. Support for repeal in Iowa is slightly lower than it is nationally.

Eighty-four percent (84%) of those who Strongly Favor repeal support Branstad. Sixty-eight percent (68%) of voters who Strongly Oppose repeal favor Culver.

Forty-nine percent (49%) of Iowa voters support passage of an immigration law like Arizona’s in their state, again lower than support nationally, while 33% oppose such a law. Eighteen percent (18%) are undecided.

Branstad earns 73% support from those who favor a law like Arizona’s in Iowa. Sixty-two percent (62%) of Iowa voters who oppose an Arizona-like law back Culver.

However, 68% of voters in the state agree with one of the chief requirements of the new Arizona law, that local police must check the immigration status of anyone they stop for a traffic violation or some other kind of violation if they suspect the person is an illegal immigrant. Twenty-two percent (22%) oppose that requirement.

Branstad is now viewed Very Favorably by 27% of Iowa voters and Very Unfavorably by 15%.

Fifteen percent (15%) have a Very Favorable opinion of Culver, while 31% view him Very Unfavorably.

Both candidates are well-known in the state, but at this point in a campaign, Rasmussen Reports considers the number of people with a strong opinion more significant than the total favorable/unfavorable numbers.

In 2008, Rasmussen Reports projected nationally that Barack Obama would defeat John McCain by a 52% to 46% margin. Obama won 53% to 46%. Four years earlier, Rasmussen Reports projected the national vote totals for both George W. Bush and John Kerry within half-a-percentage-point.

In Iowa during the 2008 campaign, Rasmussen Reports polling showed Obama leading McCain by eight, 52% to 44%. Obama won by nine, 54% to 45%. Other Iowa polling that year showed Senator Tom Harkin defeating Christopher Reed 57% to 41%. Harkin won 63% to 37%.

In the 2006 race for governor of Iowa, Rasmussen polling showed Culver leading Jim Nussle 49% to 45%. Culver won 54% to 44%. In 2004, the final Rasmussen Reports poll in Iowa showed Bush and Kerry tied at 48%. The final numbers were Bush 50%, Kerry 49%.

Rasmussen Reports also has released recent polls on the 2010 governor's races in Alabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86017)6/16/2010 1:17:12 PM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224904
 
Election 2010: South Dakota Governor
South Dakota Governor: Daugaard (R) 52%, Heidepriem (D) 36%
Tuesday, June 15, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement

Lieutenant Governor Dennis Daugaard, coming off his Republican Primary win last week, continues to hold a commanding lead over Democratic challenger Scott Heidepriem in the gubernatorial race in South Dakota.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in the state finds Duagaard earning 52% of the vote, while Heidepriem, a state senator, picks up 36% support. Only three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and nine percent (9%) more are undecided.

In three surveys conducted earlier this year, support for both candidates has shown little change. Daugaard’s support has ranged from 49% to 53%, while Heidepriem captured 32% to 36% of the vote. In late May, Daugaard posted a 51% to 36% lead.

Female voters prefer the Republican by a two-to-one margin, but male voters are almost evenly divided. Daugaard has a double-digit lead among voters not affiliated with either major party

Heidepriem faces a traditionally conservative electorate that hasn’t elected a Democratic governor since 1974.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

This statewide telephone survey of 500 Likely Voters in South Dakota was conducted on June 10, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

In South Dakota’s House of Representatives race, State Representative Kristi Noem enjoys a bounce in support following her Republican primary victory last Tuesday, earning her the right to challenge Congresswoman Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin. Noem leads that race 53% to 41%.

Sixty-six percent (66%) of voters in North Dakota favor repeal of the new national health care law, higher than support nationally for repeal. Thirty-one percent (31%) in the state oppose repeal. This includes 54% who Strongly Favor repeal of the law and 22% who are Strongly Opposed.

Seventy-three percent (73%) of the larger group who Strongly Favor repeal support Daugaard. Heidepriem earns 72% support from voters who Strongly Oppose repeal.

Twenty-four percent (24%) of all North Dakota voters consider themselves part of the Tea Party movement, compared to 16% nationally. Fifty-eight percent (58%) do not.

Seventy percent (70%) of Tea Party members support the Republican. Those who are not members are closely divided over the two candidates.

Heidepriem is viewed Very Favorably by 15% of the state’s voters and Very Unfavorably by 12%.

Twenty-seven percent (27%) have a Very Favorable opinion of Daugaard, while seven percent (7%) view him Very Unfavorably.

At this stage of the campaign, Rasmussen Reports considers the Very Favorable and Very Unfavorable figures more significant than the overall favorability totals.

A vast majority (78%) of South Dakota voters feel the U.S. military should be used on the Mexican border to prevent illegal immigration, matching the level measured nationally.

Sixty-five percent (65%) oppose a U.S. Justice Department challenge of Arizona's new immigration law, a move reportedly being considered by the Obama administration.

Sixty-four percent (64%) of the state’s voters approve of the job being done by current Governor Mike Rounds. Thirty-five percent (35%) disapprove of Rounds’ performance. Rounds, who has to step down due to term limits, endorsed Daugaard prior to the state’s GOP primary.

In 2008, Rasmussen Reports projected nationally that Barack Obama would defeat John McCain by a 52% to 46% margin. Obama won 53% to 46%. Four years earlier, Rasmussen Reports projected the national vote totals for both George W. Bush and John Kerry within half-a-percentage-point.

In South Dakota, Rasmussen Reports projected that McCain would defeat Obama by a 53% to 44% margin. McCain won 53% to 45%. In that same year, the final Rasmussen poll showed Senator Tim Johnson with a 54% to38% lead over Joel Dykstra. Johnson won 62% to 38%.

In 2004, Rasmussen Reports was the first to show John Thune ahead of Tom Daschle. The final Rasmussen poll showed Thune winning 49% to 46%. Thune won 51% to 49%. Also in 2004, the final Rasmussen poll showed Herseth leading Lawrence Diedrich 49% to 47%. Herseth won 53% to 46%.

Rasmussen Reports also has released recent polls on the 2010 governor's races in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86017)6/16/2010 1:20:18 PM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224904
 
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Wednesday, June 16, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 24% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-four percent (44%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -20 (see trends).

Forty-eight percent (48%) of Democrats Strongly Approve while 75% of Republicans Strongly Disapprove. Among those not affiliated with either major party, 12% Strongly Approve and 52% Strongly Disapprove.

These results are based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, today’s results are based almost entirely on interviews conducted before the president’s speech to the nation. The impact of the president’s speech will be seen over the next several days.

Heading into the speech, 30% of voters gave President Obama good or excellent marks for handling the oil spill. Forty-five percent (45%) said he was doing a poor job. Most voters (57%) still favor offshore oil drilling.

On another topic, most Americans (53%) continue to believe the bailout of General Motors and Chrysler was a bad idea.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook.

Overall, 42% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's performance. That’s the lowest level of approval yet recorded for this president. Fifty-seven percent (57%) now disapprove. Those are the lowest ratings yet recorded for this president. The president’s approval rating has held steady in the 46% - 47% range for six months and it remains to be seen whether this new low is merely statistical noise or the start of a lasting change.

The Rasmussen Reports Media Meter shows that media coverage of President Obama has been 41% positive over the past week. Since the passage of the health care law, coverage has ranged from a high of 60% positive to a low of 39% positive.

New state polling shows that Republicans are ahead in both the Colorado and South Dakota races for Governor.

(More Below)

Rasmussen Reports has released polls on the 2010 governor’s races in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

See the latest Rasmussen Reports 2010 Senate polling from Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.

Scott Rasmussen’s new book, In Search of Self-Governance , is available at Rasmussen Reports and Amazon.com. If you’d like Scott to speak at your conference or event, contact Premiere Speakers Bureau.

Scott has published several recent Wall Street Journal columns including “Why Obama Can’t Move the Health Care Numbers” and how Obama won the White House by campaigning like Ronald Reagan. He has also written an overview of the health care reform debate, a look at how President Obama is losing independent voters, and was the first to note the decline in the president's approval ratings.

You can also learn about Scott’s favorite place on earth and his time working with hockey legend Gordie Howe.

It is important to remember that the Rasmussen Reports job approval ratings are based upon a sample of likely voters. Some other firms base their approval ratings on samples of all adults. President Obama's numbers are always several points higher in a poll of adults rather than likely voters. That's because some of the president's most enthusiastic supporters, such as young adults, are less likely to turn out to vote. It is also important to check the details of question wording when comparing approval ratings from different firms.

(More Below)

Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology). Pollsters for Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton have cited our “unchallenged record for both integrity and accuracy.”

The Pew Center noted that Rasmussen Reports beat traditional media in covering Scott Brown's upset win in Massachusetts earlier this year: “ “It was polling—not journalistic reporting—that caught the wave in the race to succeed Massachusetts Senator Edward M. Kennedy.” Rasmussen Reports was also the first to show Joe Sestak catching Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania Democratic Primary race this year.

In the 2009 New Jersey Governor’s race, automated polls tended to be more accurate than operator-assisted polling techniques. On reviewing the state polling results from 2009, Mickey Kaus offered this assessment, “If you have a choice between Rasmussen and, say, the prestigious N.Y. Times, go with Rasmussen!”

In 2008, Obama won 53%-46% and our final poll showed Obama winning 52% to 46%. While we were pleased with the final result, Rasmussen Reports was especially pleased with the stability of our results. On every single day for the last six weeks of the campaign, our daily tracking showed Obama with a stable and solid lead attracting more than 50% of the vote.

We also have provided a summary of our 2008 state-by-state presidential results for your review.

In 2004 George W. Bush received 50.7% of the vote while John Kerry earned 48.3%. Rasmussen Reports polling projected that Bush would win 50.2% to 48.5%. We were the only firm to project both candidates’ totals within half a percentage point by (see our 2004 results).

See also our 2008 state results for Senate and governor.

See 2006 results for senate and governor.

Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. The margin of sampling error—for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters--is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for full-week results are available for Premium Members.

Like all polling firms, Rasmussen Reports weights its data to reflect the population at large (see methodology). Among other targets, Rasmussen Reports weights data by political party affiliation using a dynamic weighting process. While partisan affiliation is generally quite stable over time, there are a fair number of people who waver between allegiance to a particular party or independent status. Since the November 2008 election, the number of Democrats in the country has declined while the number of unaffiliated voters has grown.

Our baseline targets are established based upon separate survey interviews with a sample of adults nationwide completed during the preceding three months (a total of 45,000 interviews) and targets are updated monthly. Currently, the baseline targets for the adult population are 35.8% Democrats, 32.2% Republicans, and 32.1% unaffiliated. Likely voter samples typically show a slightly smaller advantage for the Democrats
rasmussenreports.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86017)6/16/2010 1:39:20 PM
From: HPilot2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224904
 
Many victims in the Exxon Valdez oil spill died before they ever received a check. The escrow fund should help speed up the claims process.

So we are going to speed it up by giving it to the government? LOL you are soooo naive.