SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 10:05:05 AM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
ROFLMAO!!! Yes they do Kenneth. You will see their love for it in November.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 11:25:57 AM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Friday, June 18, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 25% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-six percent (46%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -21 (see trends).

These results are based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, more than two-thirds of the interviews for today’s update were conducted after the president’s speech to the nation. Tomorrow’s update will be the first based entirely upon interviews conducted after the speech.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook.

Overall, 41% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's performance. That’s the lowest level of approval yet recorded for this president. Fifty-eight percent (58%) now disapprove.

Seventy-six percent (76%) of Democrats approve of the president’s performance. Eighty-five percent (85%) of Republicans disapprove along with 72% of unaffiliated voters.

President Obama’s numbers have typically bounced following a national television event. Generally, they bounce up a little. Once, following a press conference, they went down. In all cases so far, the bounce has lasted a week or so and then faded.

Thirty-three percent (33%) say the president is doing a good or an excellent job handling the Gulf oil spill. Forty-six percent (46%) say he’s doing a poor job.

The Rasmussen Reports Media Meter shows that media coverage of President Obama has been 39% positive over the past week. Since the passage of the health care law, coverage has ranged from a high of 60% positive to a low of 39% positive.

Scott Rasmussen observes that one piece of common ground among voters today “is frustration with political dialogue that seems designed to polarize and divide the public.” In his new book, he adds, “Most of us have come to believe that the political system is broken, that most politicians are corrupt, and that neither major political party has the answers. Some of us are ready to give up and some of us are ready to scream a little louder. But all of us believe we can do better. In Search of Self-Governance , is available at Rasmussen Reports and Amazon.com.

If you’d like Scott to speak at your conference or event, contact Premiere Speakers Bureau.

Scott has published several recent Wall Street Journal columns including “Why Obama Can’t Move the Health Care Numbers” and how Obama won the White House by campaigning like Ronald Reagan. He has also written an overview of the health care reform debate, a look at how President Obama is losing independent voters, and was the first to note the decline in the president's approval ratings.

You can also learn about Scott’s favorite place on earth and his time working with hockey legend Gordie Howe.

(More Below)



Rasmussen Reports has released polls on the 2010 governor’s races in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

See the latest Rasmussen Reports 2010 Senate polling from Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.

It is important to remember that the Rasmussen Reports job approval ratings are based upon a sample of likely voters. Some other firms base their approval ratings on samples of all adults. President Obama's numbers are always several points higher in a poll of adults rather than likely voters. That's because some of the president's most enthusiastic supporters, such as young adults, are less likely to turn out to vote. It is also important to check the details of question wording when comparing approval ratings from different firms.

(More Below)



Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology). Pollsters for Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton have cited our “unchallenged record for both integrity and accuracy.”

The Pew Center noted that Rasmussen Reports beat traditional media in covering Scott Brown's upset win in Massachusetts earlier this year: “ “It was polling—not journalistic reporting—that caught the wave in the race to succeed Massachusetts Senator Edward M. Kennedy.” Rasmussen Reports was also the first to show Joe Sestak catching Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania Democratic Primary race this year.

In the 2009 New Jersey Governor’s race, automated polls tended to be more accurate than operator-assisted polling techniques. On reviewing the state polling results from 2009, Mickey Kaus offered this assessment, “If you have a choice between Rasmussen and, say, the prestigious N.Y. Times, go with Rasmussen!”

In 2008, Obama won 53%-46% and our final poll showed Obama winning 52% to 46%. While we were pleased with the final result, Rasmussen Reports was especially pleased with the stability of our results. On every single day for the last six weeks of the campaign, our daily tracking showed Obama with a stable and solid lead attracting more than 50% of the vote.

We also have provided a summary of our 2008 state-by-state presidential results for your review.

In 2004 George W. Bush received 50.7% of the vote while John Kerry earned 48.3%. Rasmussen Reports polling projected that Bush would win 50.2% to 48.5%. We were the only firm to project both candidates’ totals within half a percentage point by (see our 2004 results).

See also our 2008 state results for Senate and governor.

See 2006 results for senate and governor.

Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. The margin of sampling error—for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters--is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for full-week results are available for Premium Members.

Like all polling firms, Rasmussen Reports weights its data to reflect the population at large (see methodology). Among other targets, Rasmussen Reports weights data by political party affiliation using a dynamic weighting process. While partisan affiliation is generally quite stable over time, there are a fair number of people who waver between allegiance to a particular party or independent status. Since the November 2008 election, the number of Democrats in the country has declined while the number of unaffiliated voters has grown.

Our baseline targets are established based upon separate survey interviews with a sample of adults nationwide completed during the preceding three months (a total of 45,000 interviews) and targets are updated monthly. Currently, the baseline targets for the adult population are 35.8% Democrats, 32.2% Republicans, and 32.1% unaffiliated. Likely voter samples typically show a slightly smaller advantage for the Democrats

A review of last week’s key polls is posted each Saturday morning.

Other stats on Obama are updated daily on the Rasmussen Reports By The Numbers page.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 11:27:43 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
52% Not Willing To Pay More For Clean Energy
Friday, June 18, 2010 Email to a Friend ShareThis.Advertisement

Many Americans like the idea of developing clean, environmentally friendly sources of energy, but most aren’t willing to pay for it.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 46% of Adults think that developing clean energy sources is more important than keeping the cost of energy as low as possible. But another 46% disagree and say keeping energy costs down is more important.

A year ago, by a 52% to 41% margin, Americans rated keeping the cost of energy as low as possible as the more important goal.

Still, when asked how much more they are willing to pay in taxes and utility costs each year to generate cleaner energy and fight global warming, 52% say nothing. This is down four points from last August.

Citing a new EPA study to back his proposed anti-global warming legislation, Senator Joe Lieberman estimated earlier this week that the cost to the average American household will be less than $1 a day. "Is the American household willing to pay less than $1 so we don't have to buy oil from foreign countries, so we can create millions of new jobs, so we can clean up our environment?,” he asked. “I think the answer is going to be yes."

But only 20% are willing to pay $100 more a year in taxes and utility costs for cleaner energy and to fight global warming. Twenty-four percent (24%) think $300 or more a year is an acceptable additional amount to pay.

Twenty-one percent (21%) of all adults think taking steps to stop global warming is more important than creating jobs. Seventy-one percent (71%) put more emphasis on creating jobs. From Lieberman’s remarks, it’s clear that he sees his legislation as doing both, although critics argue that the bill will actually throw many people out of jobs, particularly in the traditional energy industries.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 American adults was conducted on June 16-17, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

President Obama in his White House address to the nation Tuesday night about the Gulf oil leak outlined aggressive steps toward the development of clean energy alternatives to fossil fuels. Sixty-five percent (65%) of voters agree that finding new sources of energy is more important than reducing the amount of energy Americans now consume. But it’s important to note that the question does not specify whether these new sources of energy come from expanded oil drilling or the development of clean energy alternatives.

Sixty percent (60%) think offshore oil drilling should be allowed despite the situation in the Gulf. Seventy-six percent (76%) think offshore drilling is at least somewhat important in meeting the energy needs of the United States, including 47% who say it is Very Important.

Fifty-seven percent (57%) of men are not willing to pay any more in taxes or utility costs to generate clear energy and fight global warming, compared to 48% of women.

Fifty-seven percent (57%) of Republicans and adults not affiliated with either major party also are unwilling to pay more, while just over 20% of both groups would be willing to pay $100 more per year.

Democrats are less reluctant, with 34% willing to pay $300 or more per year for cleaner energy and to fight global warming.

But then 58% of Democrats say developing clean, environmentally friendly energy sources is more important than keeping the cost of energy as low as possible. Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Republicans disagree and say keeping energy costs down is the priority. Unaffiliated adults are more closely divided.

Republicans and unaffiliateds also put more emphasis than Democrats on creating jobs over taking steps to stop global warming.

Forty percent (40%) of voters now say global warming is caused primarily by human activity, while slightly more (44%) say long term planetary trends are to blame. Fifty-eight percent (58%) feel global warming is a serious problem, but 37% disagree.

Forty-eight percent (48%) of Americans say they are likely to buy an alternative-energy car in the next 10 years.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 12:50:27 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224750
 
Rising death tolls, military timetables slowed. Infighting in the partner government. War-weary allies packing up to leave -- and others eyeing an exit.

Events this spring -- from the battlefields of Helmand and Kandahar to the halls of Congress -- have served as a reality check on the Afghan war, a grueling fight in a remote, inhospitable land that once harbored the masterminds of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States.

The Taliban have proven resilient and won't be easily routed. Good Afghan government won't blossom any faster than flowers in the bleak Afghan deserts. Phrases like "transition to Afghan control" mask the enormous challenge ahead to make those words reality.

idiot Odumbama may face a difficult choice next year: slow the withdrawal of U.S. troops that he promised would start in July 2011 or risk an Afghanistan where the Taliban have a significant political role.

This week's hearings on Capitol Hill revealed deep concern within Congress over Pentagon assurances of progress in the nearly nine-year war. Members of Congress complained of mounting casualties -- at least 51 foreign troop deaths this month including 33 Americans.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 2:52:36 PM
From: tonto5 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224750
 
President Obama went to the groundbreaking of a road project in Columbus, Ohio, Friday to show that his massive stimulus package is still churning out jobs -- a "good news" story that was anything but for some construction workers who were trying to figure out how to make up for the payday they lost due to the president's visit.

The workers were told not to report to their construction project at a nearby hospital Friday, because the Secret Service was shutting it down for security reasons. They also were told that they would not get paid for the forced day off.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 3:53:35 PM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
the 40 it needs to regain control, based upon recent polling:

realclearpolitics.com.

The ten Senate seats needed for control are a somewhat more distant prospect, but possible.

Obamacare may not survive until 2011, let alone 2013.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 4:12:37 PM
From: chartseer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
oh bummer! Then I guess all the dumasrats will run on that issue come november. They should be sure to point out none of the repulsives voted for it either.

Don't worry! Be happy!

the stupid hopeless comrade chartseer in the new era of bamahcare



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 5:19:30 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 224750
 
lol



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 7:40:13 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224750
 
The idiot odumba is starting to look snakebit. He's starting to look unlucky, like Jimmy Carter. It wasn't Mr. Carter's fault that the American diplomats were taken hostage in Tehran, but he handled it badly, and suffered. He defied the rule of the King in "Pippin," the Broadway show of Carter's era, who spoke of "the rule that every general knows by heart, that it's smarter to be lucky than it's lucky to be smart." Mr. Carter's opposite was Bill Clinton, on whom fortune smiled with eight years of relative peace and a worldwide economic boom. What misfortune Mr. Clinton experienced he mostly created himself. History didn't impose it.

But idiot odumba is starting to look unlucky, and–file this under Mysteries of Leadership–that is dangerous for him because Americans get nervous when they have a snakebit president. They want presidents on whom the sun shines.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (86169)6/18/2010 7:50:48 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Friday, June 18, 2010
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 25% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that idiotBarack Odumbama is performing his role as president. Forty-six percent (46%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Odumbama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -21 (see trends).