SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Soccer World Cup MLS Euro Champions League etc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: X Y Zebra who wrote (3776)6/18/2010 12:24:10 PM
From: LoneClone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5130
 
Did you even read what I said?

The "cannot see what i am seeing" comment was in reference to your claim that the Slovenian were deliberately trying to kick the United Statians.

As to the disallowed goal, it looks to me like the whistle had already been blown before the foul on Bradley you are going on about.

It is the job of the referee to call a foul when he or she sees it. There were at least ten fouls being committed during the play, by both teams. It could easily have gone the other way, but the one he saw first happened to be committed by a United Statian player.

This was bad luck for them, but no excuse for the coach's son, no less, to embarrass himself and his team by screaming at the referee in front of a world wide audience after the game. The athletes I admire maintain their composure under adverse conditions.

It's part of the game. The Canadian team has been robbed of qualification for various events three times in the past ten years by inexplicable phantom penalty calls.

'Nuff said!

It's over.

Move on.

LC



To: X Y Zebra who wrote (3776)6/18/2010 12:41:00 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5130
 
You are correct. That was a terrible call. All the analysts on TV also agree.