Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (25616)	11/7/1997 1:07:00 AM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 1588033

Petz, <With $20 SRAM savings and additional mechanical costs eliminated, I can see why Intel wants to eliminate the L2 cache from the module, but its equally clear that the long term low cost solution is on-chip L2 cache as announced by AMD for K6-3D in 2Q '98.> It seems that both AMD & Intel have the same idea. crn.com My question to you is, considering the events of today, who do you think is more likely to really pull it off? EP

To: Petz who wrote (25616)	11/7/1997 1:26:00 AM
From: LTK007	Respond to of 1588033

Since I bought in at 41(due Morgan-Stanley ravings) I now actuallly hope that AMD goes down to 15 or so I can get a breakeven at about 25 and then decide whether to dump the whole she-bang.Max P.S.I will re-evaluate at 25.