had delightful meal at japanese restaurant with swiss folks, talking about everything while snarfing down sea urchin goodness and chasing down with fine grape juice and looking at the scenary around as well as victoria harbour out the window
when finally exiting ifc (the building featured in lara croft, bat man, etc), we saw some creatures sashaying around the museum-like shopping mall that constitutes the podium levels of the very large commercial/office complex, and noted that women do have call on prerogatives, and pity the ones who do not call based on birthright underpinned by genetic legacy and supported by natural smarts
however, should women judge potential spouse only on the basis of apartment and wheels, they could be making a mistake
the ads simply say, to qualify for an interview, here are some basic prerequisites, unless measuring up, do not bother to apply
and once application in, other factors come into play, as in personality, education, chemistry, character of mother-in-law, and how you would stand up to your mother on my behalf, the list would go on and on and on, doubtless
should an applicant say:
- sincere, looks good enough but not too good, well educated, with much on debt-free balance sheet, feature fully pipe-lined income statement, have abode, second abode, car, college trust fund can be enabled at call, only son, love kids, desire one boy one girl, do not drink, hate smoke, communicative,
... ... ... and can do the naughties for up to three hours with regularity
i would expect the woman would have to pony up:
- just as sincere, looking better than your good but not worryingly so, but do make secondhand clothing look enticing, better educated, have refined taste, but thrifty, can wash own carrying cost, want kids, speak multiple languages, play music instrument to the nth degree, should husband demise in unfortunate aircraft can raise kids on own, ... ... ... , tolerate occasional indiscretion in alignment with do not ask do not tell |
