Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (7833)	6/25/2010 7:02:56 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

"my permissions were based on concrete criteria and had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the multiplicity of "definitions" you or anyone else could come up with for "pederasty"." I don't particularly care about your redefinition of Pederasty. The word has a clear meaning and a long history of use, just the way it is described. Everyone will notice you provide no sources for your made up redifinition. Here it is again: thefreedictionary.com ped·er·ast (pd-rst) n. A man who has sexual relations, especially anal intercourse, with a boy. [Greek paiderasts : pais, paid-, child; see pedo-2 + erasts, lover (from ersthai, to love).] "I consider pederasty from the normal educated view.." Consider away it does not change the facts and the facts are that Pederasty is defined as "A man who has sexual relations, especially anal intercourse, with a boy." and is a sex crime. Yet you wanted to be cute and so you told Brumar that you had no objection to what the grown men of ancient Greece did with the little boys of that day and then followed it up by stating "I have no objection to YOUR Pederasty". No objection to grown men having anal sex with boys TODAY!!! You have declared your unwavering support for the RIGHTS of pedophiles. perverts and murderers What a hero! YOU'RE ONE SICK PIECE OF ____!