Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (573811)	6/26/2010 2:57:48 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577883

"Whether Jackson is corrupt is still a matter to be determined." Ok, so you posted something that wasn't true. At least you admit it. " This is a man who has sold everything he has to the labor unions" Nonsense. " who has bought and paid for political favors" Link? Or are you making this up too? "and has lied to the American People repeatedly." Yes, he has. He still isn't in the same league as Bush, but he is working on it. "No, I was just pointing out to you that corrupt democrats outnumber corrupt republicans by a wide margin. " No you didn't. You posted a list of people who you claim to be corrupt. At least one of which you admit you don't have any proof of. The rest, you don't have much if any proof of either. But there is a long list of Republicans for which proof exists and they have even been convicted. If you pad the list out with allegations that haven't been proven, the list is much, much longer. "I do believe Dick Cheney to be one of the most uncorruptable politicians alive today." Yet he interfered with a Senatorial race by getting one of the candidates to drop out. So your "uncorruptable" man doesn't seem to be so by the measure you have been using.