Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (573949)	6/27/2010 11:43:13 AM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577019

Bottom line, it isn't splitting hairs to point out that the origin of life and the origins of species are two totally different topics. Because they are fundamentally different, not just some fine detail. Totally different topics??? Sure, an origin of species thus is perfectly thinkable without life having originated first, right? Calls for some Dr. Frankenstein action, I guess. Create the species first, hook them up to a Franklin rod and wait for that life creating powerful thunder bolt... While an admirer of your grammar skills, you seem to be in over your head in other departments. Ever thought of asking wiki for hep? /Taro

To: combjelly who wrote (573949)	6/27/2010 1:06:46 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577019

CJ, > There, I addressed your points, such as they were. Nope, all you did was say, "But that wasn't the topic," or "Where did that come from?" That after a very long diatribe about the definition of splitting hairs. It's really easy to demonstrate why your original question is nonsensical, "Where is the line between life and non-life?" Just apply it to your own existence. I'd be quite surprised if you didn't consider yourself to be anything more than a virus. Tenchusatsu