SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (21534)6/27/2010 4:49:46 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 86356
 
Lawrence Solomon: Avertible catastrophe | FP Comment

U.S. Coast Guard

The BP oil-rig explosion. The U.S. turned down an offer of Dutch technology that might have reduced the spill's impact.

How U.S. labour and ­environmental rules blocked Dutch spill-cleanup technology

Some are attuned to the possibility of looming catastrophe and know how to head it off. Others are unprepared for risk and even unable to get their priorities straight when risk turns to reality.

The Dutch fall into the first group. Three days after the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico began on April 20, the Netherlands offered the U.S. government ships equipped to handle a major spill, one much larger than the BP spill that then appeared to be underway. "Our system can handle 400 cubic metres per hour," Weird Koops, the chairman of Spill Response Group Holland, told Radio Netherlands Worldwide, giving each Dutch ship more cleanup capacity than all the ships that the U.S. was then employing in the Gulf to combat the spill.

To protect against the possibility that its equipment wouldn't capture all the oil gushing from the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, the Dutch also offered to prepare for the U.S. a contingency plan to protect Louisiana's marshlands with sand barriers. One Dutch research institute specializing in deltas, coastal areas and rivers, in fact, developed a strategy to begin building 60-mile-long sand dikes within three weeks.

The Dutch know how to handle maritime emergencies. In the event of an oil spill, The Netherlands government, which owns its own ships and high-tech skimmers, gives an oil company 12 hours to demonstrate it has the spill in hand. If the company shows signs of unpreparedness, the government dispatches its own ships at the oil company's expense. "If there's a country that's experienced with building dikes and managing water, it's the Netherlands," says Geert Visser, the Dutch consul general in Houston.

In sharp contrast to Dutch preparedness before the fact and the Dutch instinct to dive into action once an emergency becomes apparent, witness the American reaction to the Dutch offer of help. The U.S. government responded with "Thanks but no thanks," remarked Visser, despite BP's desire to bring in the Dutch equipment and despite the no-lose nature of the Dutch offer — the Dutch government offered the use of its equipment at no charge. Even after the U.S. refused, the Dutch kept their vessels on standby, hoping the Americans would come round. By May 5, the U.S. had not come round. To the contrary, the U.S. had also turned down offers of help from 12 other governments, most of them with superior expertise and equipment — unlike the U.S., Europe has robust fleets of Oil Spill Response Vessels that sail circles around their make-shift U.S. counterparts.

Why does neither the U.S. government nor U.S. energy companies have on hand the cleanup technology available in Europe? Ironically, the superior European technology runs afoul of U.S. environmental rules. The voracious Dutch vessels, for example, continuously suck up vast quantities of oily water, extract most of the oil and then spit overboard vast quantities of nearly oil-free water. Nearly oil-free isn't good enough for the U.S. regulators, who have a standard of 15 parts per million — if water isn't at least 99.9985% pure, it may not be returned to the Gulf of Mexico.

When ships in U.S. waters take in oil-contaminated water, they are forced to store it. As U.S. Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, the official in charge of the clean-up operation, explained in a press briefing on June 11, "We have skimmed, to date, about 18 million gallons of oily water—the oil has to be decanted from that [and] our yield is usually somewhere around 10% or 15% on that." In other words, U.S. ships have mostly been removing water from the Gulf, requiring them to make up to 10 times as many trips to storage facilities where they offload their oil-water mixture, an approach Koops calls "crazy."

The Americans, overwhelmed by the catastrophic consequences of the BP spill, finally relented and took the Dutch up on their offer — but only partly. Because the U.S. didn't want Dutch ships working the Gulf, the U.S. airlifted the Dutch equipment to the Gulf and then retrofitted it to U.S. vessels. And rather than have experienced Dutch crews immediately operate the oil-skimming equipment, to appease labour unions the U.S. postponed the clean-up operation to allow U.S. crews to be trained.

A catastrophe that could have been averted is now playing out. With oil increasingly reaching the Gulf coast, the emergency construction of sand berns to minimize the damage is imperative. Again, the U.S. government priority is on U.S. jobs, with the Dutch asked to train American workers rather than to build the berns. According to Floris Van Hovell, a spokesman for the Dutch embassy in Washington, Dutch dredging ships could complete the berms in Louisiana twice as fast as the U.S. companies awarded the work. "Given the fact that there is so much oil on a daily basis coming in, you do not have that much time to protect the marshlands," he says, perplexed that the U.S. government could be so focussed on side issues with the entire Gulf Coast hanging in the balance.

Then again, perhaps he should not be all that perplexed at the American tolerance for turning an accident into a catastrophe. When the Exxon Valdez oil tanker accident occurred off the coast of Alaska in 1989, a Dutch team with clean-up equipment flew in to Anchorage airport to offer their help. To their amazement, they were rebuffed and told to go home with their equipment. The Exxon Valdez became the biggest oil spill disaster in U.S. history — until the BP Gulf spill.



To: Road Walker who wrote (21534)6/27/2010 5:47:09 PM
From: Eric  Respond to of 86356
 
They ought to be put out of business.

When this is all said and done it looks like they will be close to going out of business.



To: Road Walker who wrote (21534)6/28/2010 10:51:43 AM
From: Eric1 Recommendation  Respond to of 86356
 
G20 urges phasing out of fossil fuel subsidies

TORONTO (Reuters) – Leaders of the world's biggest economies will pledge on Sunday to phase out subsidies for "inefficient" fossil fuels, in a statement toughened at the last minute at the urging of the United States, Group of 20 sources said.

The G20 communique in Toronto calls for the "phase out over the medium term of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption, taking into account vulnerable groups and their development needs," said the sources, who provided the language to Reuters.

The leaders also said they would review progress toward that goal at future summits. The sources said the United States had pushed to removed watered-down language from an earlier draft.

An earlier version of the statement referred to "voluntary, member-specific approaches" to getting rid of fossil fuel subsidies but made no mention of a review of the progress.

Environmentalists viewed that as a weak commitment compared with promises made at the previous G20 summit in Pittsburgh last September.

At that gathering, hosted by President Barack Obama, leaders also vowed to phase out the subsidies. They said that jettisoning them by 2020 would reduce greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming by 10 percent by 2050. The G20 had cited data from the International Energy Agency and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The Toronto statement revived language from Pittsburgh that called for the development of time frames and strategies to implement the phase-out of subsidies.

The communique made reference to the BP Plc oil spill on the U.S. Gulf Coast. The leaders urged the sharing of best practices to protect marine life and prevent accidents and to deal with the consequences when accidents occur.

news.yahoo.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (21534)6/28/2010 10:58:00 AM
From: Eric1 Recommendation  Respond to of 86356
 
A region's new fear: An oily hurricane

GRAND ISLE, La. — Hurricanes have battered retirees Leo and Dolores Guidroz before. Katrina blew out their garage. Ike flooded their home. Each time, they rebuilt and returned to their two-story beach house, built on 8-foot stilts.
This hurricane season feels scarier, says Leo Guidroz, 77. The oil staining the nearby beach already has stolen the couple's morning routine, surf fishing for speckled trout. Thick sheets of oil bob less than 5 miles offshore.

He worries a strong storm surge would bathe their home in oil.

"You can imagine with the oil, that water will be contaminated," he says. "We might not ever be able to come back."

The threat of Tropical Storm Alex— the first significant storm of the hurricane season — has inflamed anxiety on the Gulf of Mexico's barrier islands and coastal towns. The 1,680-mile shoreline from Texas to Florida faces a volatile hurricane season with the unprecedented complication of a massive oil spill off the coast. Although the National Hurricane Center now projects Alex will hit Mexico's Gulf coast and steer south and west of the oil spill, it is predicting an unusually heavy hurricane season, with as many as 23 serious storms.

WEATHER: Alex not aiming at Gulf oil spill area for now

That is intensifying apprehension and preparations along a Gulf Coast battered first by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and now by the worst oil spill in the nation's history. Federal, state and local officials are devising plans for evacuating residents, dismantling the oil recovery operation and securing heavy equipment and ships should a storm approach. They also are considering how much compensation oil giant BP might need to pay if a storm blows oil inland.

"What we're dealing with, the oil spill, there's nothing to compare it to. We have no definitive answers right now," says Craig Fugate, administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, who began rounds of coordination calls to state officials on Friday. "With all the ships at sea and all the equipment out there, key decisions have to be made early."

Although Alex is unlikely to set federal plans in motion, Fugate says the storm should remind coastal residents to review their personal hurricane preparations and stock up on supplies.

"If you haven't gotten ready, now is the time," Fugate says.

Alex became a tropical storm Sunday night as it moved into the Gulf of Mexico and may become a hurricane as it swirls toward Mexico's east coast, the hurricane center said. Maximum sustained winds Sunday night were 45 mph.

Forecasters say the storm is still unlikely to pass over the part of the Gulf of Mexico affected by the oil spill.

The threat of the storm moving over the oil spill area is "pretty minimal" AccuWeather.com meteorologist John Feerick says. "It doesn't look like it would have the opportunity to go as far east."

Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, who is overseeing the federal response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, says his team is "in constant contact" with the National Hurricane Center.

"At this point, it does not threaten the site, but we know that these tracks can change, and we're paying very close attention to it," Allen said in a briefing Saturday. "We know the weather is unpredictable and we could have a sudden, last-minute change."

Concern about spreading oil

Meteorologists describe several scenarios if a hurricane moves into the Gulf of Mexico, an event that would trigger complex evacuation procedures and dramatically disrupt the oil spill cleanup.

If a storm strikes the Gulf, it would spin water like a washing machine, says Dan Kottlowski, expert senior meteorologist at AccuWeather.com, in State College, Pa. Where it spins the oil will depend on its path, he says.

A storm that passes to the west of the spill would drive some of the oily water to the shore in a storm surge, says Chris Vaccaro, spokesman for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. A storm that passes to the east would spin the oily water out to sea.

The wind and high seas might accelerate the breakdown of the oil, he says.

If a storm approaches, Allen would stop the cleanup process about five days before forecasters predict the first gale-force wind — at least 39 miles per hour — would hit the area. The Discoverer Enterprise, one of the vessels collecting oil from the ruptured BP well, needs 114 hours to disconnect from the riser pipe and move to safe harbor, Allen says.

Nearly 3,000 barges, 430 skimmers and 2,700 other vessels — including Coast Guard command and control boats — would have to be moved to secure ports, he says, and 38,634 Coast Guard, National Guard, contractors, BP employees and volunteers would potentially have to evacuate.

"We need to be able to move our personnel where it doesn't conflict with the general public evacuation," he says.

A storm would disrupt oil cleanup and recovery in the Gulf for about two weeks, Allen says, leaving oil to gush unabated into the Gulf.

In Florida, Gov. Charlie Crist on Sunday met with emergency management and environmental officials at the pier on Pensacola Beach. A forecaster said this storm was not likely to hit the state or the area of the oil spill, but waves from the storm could push more oil and tar onto Panhandle beaches, the Associated Press reported.

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., in a letter to Allen, asked whether the Coast Guard and Navy could pre-position ships to respond in the aftermath of a storm to skim the extra oil.

"Figure several days downtime as the storm approaches, a few more days as the storm passes, and a couple more days to get things back in place — and, you're facing up to 10 days or more of the well gushing some 60,000 barrels a day unchecked," Nelson said. "That's 600,000 barrels we'd then have to collect quickly after a storm passed, and before it could hit parts of the Gulf Coast. Right now, there just isn't enough capacity or bigger ships to collect and skim that much oil on the surface."

Long-established evacuation plans for residents along Louisiana's Gulf Coast remain the same, but state officials must coordinate with BP and the Coast Guard to protect thousands of contractors, workers and employees who are cleaning up the oil, says Louisiana's homeland security chief, Mark Cooper.

The state will require BP to move its workers and equipment three days before 40-mph wind reaches the Louisiana coast, Cooper says.

"We don't want BP having all their equipment on the road blocking the highways, breaking down," Cooper says. "It's very important their timeline is based on our timeline."

Louisiana's St. Bernard Parish, a coastal community southeast of New Orleans devastated by Hurricane Katrina five years ago, has separate plans to evacuate residents and oil spill contractors. The parish will order evacuations for oil spill work sites 72 hours before gale-force winds are predicted to hit the Louisiana coast.

"Evacuation plans for oil spill operations have been tailored so as to not interfere with the St. Bernard Parish's overall evacuation plan," parish officials said in a statement.

If a storm pushes oil into the parish, officials will close the area to residents until fire, police and federal environmental experts determine the areas are safe.

At Port Fourchon, Louisiana's southernmost port, Harbor Police Chief Jon Callais met Friday with BP and Coast Guard officials to discuss how best to move 1,000 oil cleanup workers and their tons of equipment, including a tent city where many live. Workers also are living in trailers stacked on a barge and floating in a port. Those "boatels" will have to be sailed 27 miles up waterways to keep them out of a storm's path, Callais says.

During Katrina, unmanned barges in New Orleans tore from their moorings and slammed into levees, causing more damage.

"Those are cause for concern," Callais says. "They're like floating missiles."

In Grand Isle, a 7-mile stretch of beach in southern Louisiana, trucks and bulldozers rumble down state Highway 1, and 1,800 oil-response workers live in rows of aluminum trailers.

Evacuating the workers and their equipment will clog the one road out of Grand Isle, says Deano Bonano, Jefferson Parish's homeland security chief.

BP is still finalizing plans, he says.

"It took months to bring that equipment down there. It isn't all going to leave in 120 hours," Bonano says.

A strong storm could deposit oil into southern Louisiana's delicate marshes — something cleanup crews have been fighting to prevent since the BP well exploded April 20, says Garret Graves, head of the state's office of coastal activities.

Cooper, the state's homeland security chief, says he's still unsure who would bear the costs of cleaning up inland oil after the storm. FEMA usually reimburses states for hurricane cleanup, but BP is responsible for costs tied to the oil spill. It's less clear, he says, who is responsible for cleaning up oil spread by a hurricane.

Fugate says the federal government is still researching legal aspects of the cleanup.

"If there is oil inland that needs to be cleaned up, we don't want to argue if it's BP's oil or some other party," Cooper says. "We just want it cleaned up."

Praying for help

As the government hashes out logistics, nervous residents of Grand Isle are seeking spiritual solace.

Since Alex formed in the Caribbean Sea last week, the offices at Our Lady of the Isle Catholic Church in Grand Isle have been jammed with phone calls from worried residents.

And lots of requests.

Parishioners have called asking the pastor, Mike Tran, to bless their rosaries and crucifixes, to bless bottles of water so they can sprinkle it on their homes, to hold Holy Communion on the beach and to throw scapulars into the surf to fend off hurricanes, Tran says.

The requests piled up so high that Tran had to call his bishop for guidance. The threat of a hurricane has amplified the island's anxiety.

"It's doubling the fear and the threat level amid the oil crisis," Tran says.

At Sunday's Mass, Tran led parishioners in three Hail Mary prayers to deter hurricanes from reaching Louisiana's coast.

"We need to pray for God's intervention," he told them.

usatoday.com