SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (574404)6/30/2010 7:24:00 AM
From: steve harris1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1579704
 
Seems the DNC party of personal destruction has been brought out into the light...

Message 26652491

Sarah Palin discusses who funded all the lawsuits against her while she was Governor of Alaska
The lawsuits basically forced her to leave office as governor. They would have taken a huge amount of her time just dealing with depositions. For those who haven't been through a deposition, 28 cases would have taken one day for the deposition and easily at least two or three days to prepare. Add to that the legal bill that Palin would have had to pay based on her governor's salary. Even without more cases being filed (and more would be filed), Palin would have gotten little else done as governor.

So who funded the lawsuits?

The National Democratic Committee used its Alaska chapter, the Alaska Democratic Party (ADP), to create a website with one stated goal: "Keep Sarah Palin Out of Public Office." To this day, the Democrats use this website to publicly seek donations for funding bogus "legal challenges involving issues related to Sarah Palin."
The ADP's "Keep Sarah Palin Out of Public Office" campaign used our own legal system to sponsor more than two dozen ethics complaints against Governor Palin. Out of the 27 complaints, 26 were dismissed!
The so-called "independent counsel" who started this investigation was an attorney from President Barack Obama's law firm.

johnrlott.blogspot.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (574404)6/30/2010 8:12:14 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1579704
 
Its no myth .... amazing that liberals can pretend it is.

the holy war could end if America would stop using military force. He said in court, “Until the hour the U.S. pulls its forces from Iraq and Afghanistan and stops the drone strikes in Somalia and Yemen and in Pakistan and stops the occupation of Muslim lands and stops killing the Muslims and stops reporting the Muslims to its government, ...

Gee, all we have to do is stand down and they won't attack us anymore. Uh, yeah but we're doing most of those things BECAUSE of earlier jihad attacks on the US (see 911, the US Cole, the African embassy bombings, the first attempt to bring down the WTC in 1993, etc.).



To: Road Walker who wrote (574404)6/30/2010 10:26:10 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Respond to of 1579704
 
The Myth of Modern Jihad

By ROBERT WRIGHT


Pipes name appears more often than Faisal Shahzad in that hit piece - probably should rename the article - why my opinion is right and Pipes is wrong.

Classic attack the messenger stuff.



To: Road Walker who wrote (574404)6/30/2010 1:20:04 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1579704
 
RW, from the column,

> It’s only natural to attribute to your enemy more cohesion and menace than is in order.

Sounds like how Karl Rove and Dick Cheney were characterized ...



Tenchusatsu