SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (370906)6/30/2010 8:13:23 AM
From: Little Joe1 Recommendation  Respond to of 794280
 
The argument that partial birth abortion is sometimes necessary to protect the health of the mother can be answered by a simple question.

If a child's body except for its head is outside the mother's body and you have two choices, one being to move the body a few inches and cut the umbilical cord and the second being to keep the body in place and stick of pair of scissors into the child's head or crush the head and then sever the umbilical cord. How can choosing the birth option have any adverse effect on the health of the mother?

lj



To: Brumar89 who wrote (370906)6/30/2010 8:55:18 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794280
 
This establishes a pattern

she herself appears to have written the key language that eventually appeared in the ACOG report.

Just like they did with the Drilling Moratorium report. They don't like what the experts say, rewrite what they said.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (370906)6/30/2010 2:10:49 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794280
 
Kagan, after 8 tries by Hatch admits that the document is "certainly in my handwriting" .


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News